Counter-Strike 1.4 & Steam Beta

In an unprecedented move, Valve Software has apparently opened the beta test of Counter-Strike 1.4 and their new Steam content delivery system to the public. CS-Nation has instructions and downloads of the Steam client setup and the key generator that will allow you play C-S 1.4 and the latest versions of Half-Life, TeamFortress Classic and Day of Defeat after registration (and also try the new Tracker instant messaging system), while Planet Half-Life and Shacknews have additional mirrors. It is important to note that the Steam system is designed for broadband users only, and that this is a beta test rather than an official release.
View : : :
13.
 
Re: No subject
Mar 7, 2002, 08:03
13.
Re: No subject Mar 7, 2002, 08:03
Mar 7, 2002, 08:03
 
"I guess people complain so much because they want Valve to release another genre-defining kick- ass game like the original HL?"

Not to mention forcing TFC and DMC on us in recent patches (even if we don't damn well want them), hence making those patches HUGE, not bothering to upgrade the graphics engine to cope with more polys and level texture detail (come on Valve, it wouldn't be hard, we've all upgraded our P100s now) and relying on a mod they didn't make (CS) to continue earning money off HL. Making patches isn't that hard and all the other HL content has been from Gearbox or mod makers, just what the hell can they all be doing there at Valve?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@208.1
2.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@24.241
3.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@209.233
10.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@66.190
23.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@208.1
4.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@24.114
5.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@24.104
6.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@24.247
8.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
   Re: TF2??
9.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
    Re: TF2??
anon@80.135
14.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
    Re: TF2??
15.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
     I dont get it
anon@62.254
16.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
      Re: I dont get it
anon@68.1
18.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
       Re: I dont get it
anon@195.99
7.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@208.190
11.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@217.234
12.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@199.74
19.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@66.214
21.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@199.74
 13.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
 Re: No subject
17.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@151.208
20.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
25.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
31.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
32.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
62.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
22.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@65.92
24.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
30.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@203.51
38.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@212.135
26.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@199.243
27.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@209.26
29.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@213.233
28.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@213.105
37.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@192.187
33.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
34.
Mar 7, 2002Mar 7 2002
anon@24.114
35.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
36.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@24.55
39.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
51.
Mar 9, 2002Mar 9 2002
anon@217.158
40.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@12.43
42.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@12.43
41.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@207.2
43.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@217.82
44.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@217.82
45.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@217.82
46.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@217.82
49.
Mar 9, 2002Mar 9 2002
50.
Mar 9, 2002Mar 9 2002
anon@209.162
63.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
anon@131.96
64.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
anon@198.23
65.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
anon@209.167
66.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
anon@209.167
68.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
47.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
48.
Mar 8, 2002Mar 8 2002
anon@67.32
52.
Mar 10, 2002Mar 10 2002
53.
Mar 10, 2002Mar 10 2002
anon@204.99
54.
Mar 10, 2002Mar 10 2002
55.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
anon@205.188
56.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
anon@64.81
57.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
58.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
59.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
60.
Mar 11, 2002Mar 11 2002
61.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
anon@152.163
67.
Mar 12, 2002Mar 12 2002
69.
Mar 13, 2002Mar 13 2002
anon@152.163
70.
Mar 13, 2002Mar 13 2002
anon@198.23
71.
Mar 13, 2002Mar 13 2002
72.
Mar 13, 2002Mar 13 2002
73.
Mar 14, 2002Mar 14 2002
74.
Apr 20, 2002Apr 20 2002
anon@24.228