On Take 2, GTA, & DNF

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year End 2001 Financial Results and Fiscal 2002 Guidance is a press release outlining the latest financials at this software publisher. HomeLan Fed has posted a summary of some of the woes that the report contains, including word that they are being investigated by the SEC, while in more pleasant (and game-related) news, also has word on plans for an upcoming Grand Theft Auto game (which will be called Grand Theft Auto: Miami, according to Gamers.com), a spring./summer release for GTA3 for the PC, and word that Duke Nukem Forever "is not factored into the Company's fiscal 2002 guidance," which means it is not likely to come out before October 31, 2002.
View : : :
40.
 
No subject
Feb 19, 2002, 17:55
40.
No subject Feb 19, 2002, 17:55
Feb 19, 2002, 17:55
 
does it matter if bullet time was "stolen" from something else? Max Payne defenitely did a good job of putting it into the game, it was both fun AND useful. Who cares if it was in a movie or done before, as long as they did a good job of implementing it its fine by me. I mean almost everything is technically a copy of something else...microsoft word is a copy of writing on a piece of paper with a pencil...but do we care? no

max payne may have not been teh first game to do a bullet time type thing (i heard some mods for some fps' had it before) but it was defenitely the first game to implement it into a really good game and bring it to the main stream public.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@144.137
2.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
3.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@171.159
4.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@203.164
5.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@216.23
6.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
7.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@216.78
14.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
15.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
anon@216.78
16.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
8.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@216.23
18.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
anon@131.116
9.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@216.23
10.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@209.31
12.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
11.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
13.
Feb 13, 2002Feb 13 2002
anon@12.230
17.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
19.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
20.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
21.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
22.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
anon@24.182
23.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
anon@216.23
44.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
53.
Feb 21, 2002Feb 21 2002
anon@24.25
24.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
anon@216.23
25.
Feb 14, 2002Feb 14 2002
 DNF
26.
Feb 15, 2002Feb 15 2002
27.
Feb 15, 2002Feb 15 2002
28.
Feb 16, 2002Feb 16 2002
29.
Feb 16, 2002Feb 16 2002
30.
Feb 16, 2002Feb 16 2002
31.
Feb 16, 2002Feb 16 2002
45.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
46.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@216.136
47.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@63.14
32.
Feb 16, 2002Feb 16 2002
33.
Feb 17, 2002Feb 17 2002
38.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
34.
Feb 17, 2002Feb 17 2002
35.
Feb 18, 2002Feb 18 2002
anon@144.9
36.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
anon@212.205
37.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
39.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
42.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
43.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
50.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
 40.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
No subject
41.
Feb 19, 2002Feb 19 2002
anon@24.91
48.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@63.14
49.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@62.7
51.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@12.226
52.
Feb 20, 2002Feb 20 2002
anon@216.244