The Druid King Demo

Russian site Game.EXE has posted a playable demo of The Druid King, the isometric RTS with adventure and role-playing elements under construction at Bulgarian developers Haemimont Games. In case your Russian vocabulary doesn't extend beyond Da and Njet, not to worry, as you can also view the page through Babel Fish and the 85.7 MB demo itself is in English. Update: The demo turned out to be an old alpha version that was not meant for public distribution, so we have removed the links to it.
View : : :
90.
 
Re: #66 plus a few others
Jan 22, 2002, 18:53
anon@24.242
90.
Re: #66 plus a few others Jan 22, 2002, 18:53
Jan 22, 2002, 18:53
anon@24.242
 
I tried to let it go...

...I can't. To the guys that made attempts in vain to keep this thread on the Druid topic, I applaud you. I'll download the demo right after I type this. And apologies for going against your wishes.


Hi. I'm 31 and live in America. I'm a Team Manager for a leading router support group, drive an awesome car, have a great wife, own my home, and do whatever I want when I want. I say this ahead of time so you will not categorize me into whatever theory they have taught you about Americans, and to not prejudge me as being someone like the #4 kook. Do you not have stupid people in your country? Or do all of them carry the same amount of brilliance as yourself.

...I pity you people. You are very bitter. Your bitterness seethes out of you. I just can't bring myself to the level that you've stooped. I'm sorry you don't have the same great place to live in that we do, and I'm sorry your government hasn't given you the same opportunities that mine has. I hope those hackers and young scholars make your country a better place to live in someday. gg

My government makes mistakes. I understand that they do things that might not be in the best interest of other countries. Guess what, we elected them. They will do whatever is in the best interest of OUR people first. If that means making tough decisions and upsetting someone else, then so be it. If they don't get the job done, then they get the F out. I hope some day you have leaders that 'go to bat' for you like ours do.

Your cheap shots regarding the world trade center really upset me. I'm sorry you feel that way. But again, I will not stoop down to your level. gg again

Yes, I'll go on living my same satisfying life (in my eyes anyway). I'll be thinking about you people on occasion though. Heh, I might even be sad for you. I ask you to ponder one notion though. Please ask yourself if you really believe all Americans are trash. A few are. Most aren't. Hope you get to visit us sometime, so that you will see why in my mind your thoughts on those topic are really narrowminded. I think you will like it here.

Thanks, and Apologies on behalf of the #4 kook that insulted you.
-Wideout
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.17
2.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
3.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
4.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
5.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
6.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
7.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
  Re: #5
8.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
11.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
12.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.50
13.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@209.133
14.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
15.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
17.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
19.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
21.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: game
24.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
     Re: game
anon@198.49
16.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.200
30.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@66.61
18.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@205.237
39.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
40.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
   Re: game
anon@212.72
41.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
    Re: game
anon@194.82
42.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
     Re: game
43.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
      Re: game
anon@193.227
47.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@195.34
48.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
        Re: game
anon@195.34
49.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
         Re: game
anon@195.34
60.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@63.195
79.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.31
80.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
81.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
93.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@24.197
94.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
  Re: 79
anon@24.197
9.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.92
10.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
20.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.190
22.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.95
23.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
27.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
29.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
31.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
32.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: Wigglin'
anon@24.190
25.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.124
26.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@207.12
28.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
89.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@68.0
 90.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
   Re: #66 plus a few others
anon@24.242
33.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
34.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@64.218
35.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
36.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.162
37.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
38.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@194.82
68.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
69.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
44.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
45.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.50
46.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
  Reply
anon@194.82
50.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
51.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
52.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@65.89
53.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
61.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
54.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
55.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
56.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
57.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@24.190
58.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
64.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
anon@68.52
59.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
62.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
63.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
65.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@193.227
66.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
70.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
67.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
71.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
74.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@216.150
76.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@68.51
72.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
73.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.252
75.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
77.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@194.222
78.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@217.9
82.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
anon@24.69
83.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
84.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
85.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@195.255
86.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@212.73
88.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
87.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@24.28
91.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@195.255
92.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@208.190
95.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002