The Druid King Demo

Russian site Game.EXE has posted a playable demo of The Druid King, the isometric RTS with adventure and role-playing elements under construction at Bulgarian developers Haemimont Games. In case your Russian vocabulary doesn't extend beyond Da and Njet, not to worry, as you can also view the page through Babel Fish and the 85.7 MB demo itself is in English. Update: The demo turned out to be an old alpha version that was not meant for public distribution, so we have removed the links to it.
View : : :
66.
 
to #4 and the rest of trash
Jan 19, 2002, 08:02
anon@24.69
66.
to #4 and the rest of trash Jan 19, 2002, 08:02
Jan 19, 2002, 08:02
anon@24.69
 
hey i am russian. i don't really give a shit if it's in war or if any country is in war as long as i'm not a part of it.
but saying about russia what you said, (i think it was ppl are like animals and shit and in warzone) was so of you americans.
look at the europe, now why ppl don't shoot children in school? why you are alowed to drink if you are not 19? and why being drunk 19 they don't go shooting up ppl...?
why is mostly anyone in europe has atleast a slite antisimphafy to USA? is it coz of jealosy? hell no, you got to be stupid to think this way. or is it coz over some centuries while europe was at wars the forming usa kinda was left outside of those conflicts and had time to grow up with it's fresh land. so by 20th cetury the economy was building up around usa for it was always isolated from anyshit due to it's geographical position. so what you see now is european politicians smiling around usa ones for their money are invested in usa industry and they wouldn't wanna loose those but inside they don't give a shit about usa. it's all for public show off, it was like that and it will always be untill usa falls and it will happen at some point coz no "empire" (in this case industrial, not militarized) lasted for long. why not militarized? coz nukes don't scare ppl. nukes are actually the safes weapon human kind ever build since if one launches one, the opposide coutry will too and the border countries would get hurt by radiation too and they would be so so pissed of to fire another nuke. so put nukes aside and never even bother considering the as dangerous, it's either peace or no earth and no one would go for it ever. so now with nukes left, what do you have? oh yah the ground forces, ofcourse against ppl with 50 year old weapons on the hourses, that's a good match but not against another armed country. so troops are no good. vehicles? ok yah lots of bombers and shit, up against ancient weapons that soviet union was selling due to their outdateness and then you see afgan ppl using them and not hitting the place due to the weapons age and lack of skill on afgan side to control them. hell those AAs don't even have sophisticated radars. try flying those planes over some country in europe like, especially over russia, the planes and all the f117s wouldn't last long coz all u see on tv and saw in hate-pointing anti russia movies was wrong. sometimes even now i see some usa movies about russian that i haven't seen before i kinda wanna cry coz they just show how ignorant most of usa ppl are and how poorly educated they are with the huge greed for power and money.
so that was military part. there is nothing to worry here coz one way or the over some over country would stand up for other if a war would begin. yugoslavia was a special case coz it wasn't in war with usa. oh and don't forget that every time something like this happen you get more anti usa favor all over the world.
so we only stuck on economy and that is the reason why the rest of the world licks usa's ass. yah why not let usa market in a country? it's cheaper for the rulers of that country to get already made stuff and just import it and get rich while economy of a country suffers due to no self production andtherefore no competition on the mark with foreign products.
if you think usa rules, then you are wrong, yes, say it, i hate USA for the corrupt democratic government that doesn't give a shit about the world, searching and doing something only for it's own interests pretending to be something else, something with a halo above. for soooooooooo many ppl like #4 coz that's what you mostly gonna hear from general public in usa, this kind of attitude based on hollywood movies aimed for their own usa small-minded ppl, leaving in their own lives, only for themselves, with a stupid dream to be a superstar or a millionare with a pack of dollars on the silver plate that get's served in the morning for breakfast. tell you what, money don't come from thin air.

k lets take microsoft or our favorable intel over super vulcanically hot amd. tell me, how many ppl from europe work there and especially how many ppl from russia work there, how many russian programmers. oh yah baby alot, more than you think.

about more than 50% of world's hackers are russians, why? nah not coz some bad guys but coz they are bored with simple things that are so complicated for us.

tired of writing now but i could go on and on and write 100 assay that would look much better and would win nobel prize instead i would tell you to think twise next time what usa is and what it does.
i forgot to mention that education in usa sucks, put a 5th grade student from anywhere in europe to a 8th grade in usa or canada and it might actually turn out that that student knows more shit than their new usa/canadian teachers. don't believe me? fine, just telling you the true fact.

of the other fact: why foreigners don't get good jobs in usa/canada? nope you are wrong again.
coz smart ppl in usa know that and realize that specialists from europe, japan, blabla, know much more in their fields and the usa emploer wouldn't like to be left without a job and constant ambaresment infront of his collegues.

see ya later guys, and if i see some flames after this one then i proved my point (if there was one, coz it's all been known for long time, that's ofcourse for non ignorant usa population)
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.17
2.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
3.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
4.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
5.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
6.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
7.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
  Re: #5
8.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
11.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
12.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.50
13.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@209.133
14.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
15.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
17.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
19.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
21.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: game
24.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
     Re: game
anon@198.49
16.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.200
30.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@66.61
18.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@205.237
39.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
40.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
   Re: game
anon@212.72
41.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
    Re: game
anon@194.82
42.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
     Re: game
43.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
      Re: game
anon@193.227
47.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@195.34
48.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
        Re: game
anon@195.34
49.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
         Re: game
anon@195.34
60.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@63.195
79.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.31
80.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
81.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
93.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@24.197
94.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
  Re: 79
anon@24.197
9.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.92
10.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
20.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.190
22.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.95
23.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
27.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
29.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
31.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
32.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: Wigglin'
anon@24.190
25.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.124
26.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@207.12
28.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
89.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@68.0
90.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@24.242
33.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
34.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@64.218
35.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
36.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.162
37.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
38.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@194.82
68.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
69.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
44.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
45.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.50
46.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
  Reply
anon@194.82
50.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
51.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
52.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@65.89
53.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
61.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
54.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
55.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
56.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
57.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@24.190
58.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
64.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
anon@68.52
59.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
62.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
63.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
65.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@193.227
 66.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
to #4 and the rest of trash
anon@24.69
70.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
67.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
71.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
74.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@216.150
76.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@68.51
72.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
73.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.252
75.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
77.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@194.222
78.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@217.9
82.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
anon@24.69
83.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
84.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
85.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@195.255
86.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@212.73
88.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
87.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@24.28
91.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@195.255
92.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@208.190
95.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002