The Druid King Demo

Russian site Game.EXE has posted a playable demo of The Druid King, the isometric RTS with adventure and role-playing elements under construction at Bulgarian developers Haemimont Games. In case your Russian vocabulary doesn't extend beyond Da and Njet, not to worry, as you can also view the page through Babel Fish and the 85.7 MB demo itself is in English. Update: The demo turned out to be an old alpha version that was not meant for public distribution, so we have removed the links to it.
View : : :
14.
 
Re: game
Jan 16, 2002, 18:00
14.
Re: game Jan 16, 2002, 18:00
Jan 16, 2002, 18:00
 
3. BULGARIAN DEVELOPERS - bulgarians is near russia on the map. Population, 344,000

Yeah, they truly must be the root of all evil. Never trust a country with less than a million people in it! They will probably come and murder all of us in our sleep. Stands to reason! And then enslave us and force us to play all these bad russian games. And maybe murder us again afterwards...

And Frans, don't get me started about Frans. He's from the Netherlands and that's not that far from Russia either! And pretty small as well. No wonder he keeps projecting these evil x-rays through the internet that try to take over our minds! Probably also playing Tetris all the time, to train his evil almost-russian intellect for taking over the world.

Tetris! A truly russian game, what with the lower blocks all fitting in next to each other so neatly, sharing the same space. And then the upper blocks fall upon them and oppress them and then, when everything has grown so big that there's no freedom anymore, you loose and probably don't even make the highscore. Yeah, a communist game to the roots... Beware!

...

Why is it that I always get the urge to write these sarcastic posts after I read something from frederickson? Maybe he's also projecting some x-rays after all (maybe he visited Russia in his youth or something). Now, where's that aluminium foil?

Fully automatic backups with Ocster Backup Pro 3
http://www.ocster.com
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.17
2.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
3.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
4.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
5.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
6.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
7.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
  Re: #5
8.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
11.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@62.24
12.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.50
13.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@209.133
 14.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
 Re: game
15.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
17.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
19.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
   Re: game
21.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: game
24.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
     Re: game
anon@198.49
16.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.200
30.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@66.61
18.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@205.237
39.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
40.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
   Re: game
anon@212.72
41.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
    Re: game
anon@194.82
42.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
     Re: game
43.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
      Re: game
anon@193.227
47.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@195.34
48.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
        Re: game
anon@195.34
49.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
         Re: game
anon@195.34
60.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
       Re: game
anon@63.195
79.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.31
80.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
81.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
93.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@24.197
94.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
  Re: 79
anon@24.197
9.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.92
10.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
20.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.190
22.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.95
23.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
27.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
29.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
31.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
32.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
    Re: Wigglin'
anon@24.190
25.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@212.124
26.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@207.12
28.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
89.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@68.0
90.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@24.242
33.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
34.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@64.218
35.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
36.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.162
37.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
38.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@194.82
68.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
69.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
44.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.72
45.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.50
46.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
  Reply
anon@194.82
50.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
51.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
52.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@65.89
53.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
61.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
54.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
55.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@66.171
56.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
57.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@24.190
58.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@212.124
64.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
anon@68.52
59.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
62.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
63.
Jan 18, 2002Jan 18 2002
65.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@193.227
66.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
70.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
67.
Jan 19, 2002Jan 19 2002
anon@24.69
71.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
74.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@216.150
76.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@68.51
72.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
73.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@62.252
75.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@24.69
77.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@194.222
78.
Jan 20, 2002Jan 20 2002
anon@217.9
82.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
anon@24.69
83.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
84.
Jan 21, 2002Jan 21 2002
85.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@195.255
86.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@212.73
88.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
87.
Jan 22, 2002Jan 22 2002
anon@24.28
91.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@195.255
92.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002
anon@208.190
95.
Jan 23, 2002Jan 23 2002