The GORE Dream Catches On

DreamCatcher Acquires 3D PC Blast-Fest GORE by 4D Rulers is the announcement that this first-person shooter that's been an independent project until now has found a publisher, as they've signed on with DreamCatcher Interactive. The release, which lists Spring 2002 as the game's projected release date, offers the gory GORE story, their unique weapon and stamina systems, and a description of gameplay: "In GORE’s revolutionary gameplay world, players will need more than a quick trigger-finger to demolish their opponents. The game’s 8 to 10 unique player classes allow each player to choose the character with the right weapons, strengths, and abilities for them. Most of GORE’s frighteningly lethal weapons have secondary-fire modes, a feature that gives players over 30 ways to demolish their opponents. But that’s just the beginning. Almost anything you see in GORE can be destroyed: weapons, health and stamina packs, ammo boxes, gas tanks and more. Don’t want a wounded enemy to get a health pack? Shoot it right before he touches it, and watch the pack explode with lethal force. Four game modes (Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch, Capture the Flag, and Tactical warfare) make GORE challenging for any level of player."
View : : :
60 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  ] Older
60.
 
No subject
Jan 23, 2002, 17:06
60.
No subject Jan 23, 2002, 17:06
Jan 23, 2002, 17:06
 
56:

"Dude, you sound like you took a Critical Thinking course at College and want to lord it over everybody."

I share your humor, and yes, it does sound a bit ridiculous, especially if people still do not get the point that was conveyed to them with such simplicity.

57:

"... is a failure to communicate."

You are damn right. You hit the nail on the head with that post.

58:

"Rape is a right because rape is an ability. Rights are governed by governors of society (the police). I wish rape was not a right, but it is, unfortunately.

Horsesh*t. A right is something that you can do regardless of whether or not people want you to do it. For example, I have a right to speak freely. Therefore, despite the fact that you may not wish to hear my disagreements with you, I can still say them anyway.

Therefore, if rape is a right, I can go over to your sister's house and rape her. If she doesn't want me to, tough. It's my right, so I can do it."

I already explained myself in post 54. I ponder why you did not see that.

"Now read that paragraph again. Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?"

Yeah, it sounds real ridiculous when you skipped an entire post in your favor. I cannot see why you did not understand what I had said in post 54. Again, if you have not read that post, go read it now. It clearly states that I have been in the wrong with the definition of the meaning of the word 'right'.

Sorry for any conveniences, but I think I have misused the word for the sake of arguing, but more importantly and more likely, I have used it in the wrong sense in an earlier argument in another thread.

59:

“Hi i am a Lawyer i'd like to to take this case to te Supreme Courts. An then go see your sister”

Haw, now that is the type of material we need at this moment.


-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
59.
 
Re: Court
Jan 23, 2002, 08:46
anon@24.197
59.
Re: Court Jan 23, 2002, 08:46
Jan 23, 2002, 08:46
anon@24.197
 
Hi i am a Lawyer i'd like to to take this case to te Supreme Courts. An then go see your sister
58.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 23, 2002, 06:49
58.
Re: No subject Jan 23, 2002, 06:49
Jan 23, 2002, 06:49
 
Rape is a right because rape is an ability. Rights are governed by governors of society (the police). I wish rape was not a right, but it is, unfortunately.

Horsesh*t. A right is something that you can do regardless of whether or not people want you to do it. For example, I have a right to speak freely. Therefore, despite the fact that you may not wish to hear my disagreements with you, I can still say them anyway.

Therefore, if rape is a right, I can go over to your sister's house and rape her. If she doesn't want me to, tough. It's my right, so I can do it.

Now read that paragraph again. Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?

Later...

-Pyran

57.
 
What we have here...
Jan 23, 2002, 06:18
anon@212.73
57.
What we have here... Jan 23, 2002, 06:18
Jan 23, 2002, 06:18
anon@212.73
 
... is a failure to communicate.

56.
 
Heh..
Jan 23, 2002, 01:31
56.
Heh.. Jan 23, 2002, 01:31
Jan 23, 2002, 01:31
 
Dude, you sound like you took a Critical Thinking course at College and want to lord it over everybody.

55.
 
No subject
Jan 22, 2002, 11:24
55.
No subject Jan 22, 2002, 11:24
Jan 22, 2002, 11:24
 
Of course, it also matters who you are inside. It does not matter to have an education as much as it is to have real sense. Real sense in that we must learn to get along with each other.

As soon as we learn to do away with petty insults, we will learn that our posts may consist of nothing of any real value.

-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
54.
 
No subject
Jan 22, 2002, 11:21
54.
No subject Jan 22, 2002, 11:21
Jan 22, 2002, 11:21
 
I guess I'll have to apologize for misuse of the word 'right'. I understand why I had said that and I do not intend to make the same mistake, and I should have worded my posts a bit better than I have. But anyhow, there are issues to be solved.

"I think teh mane man should bone up on 'teh anglesh lanquach' though, or stick to a simpler style of writing. The 'I desperately want to sound intelligent' thing gets tedious pretty fast"

It gets tedious when you have no substantial evidence of your conclusion with my writing ability. Your post consists of nonsensical drivel.

"You're an idiot! How can anyone actually contradict the dictionary and common sense so stubbornly!"

I think I should have replaced 'right' with 'ability'. Of course, since I used the words 'right' and 'ability', I don't think I could have defended my definition of rights with different wording.

People often do things that they do not intend to do at times. At one time or another, mistakes can be evaded from thinking about the decisions you make for a few seconds instead of acting on instinct.

-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
53.
 
No subject
Jan 22, 2002, 06:50
anon@195.255
53.
No subject Jan 22, 2002, 06:50
Jan 22, 2002, 06:50
anon@195.255
 
teh mane man:
"Rape is a right because rape is an ability."

ability equals right?

You're an idiot! How can anyone actually contradict the dictionary and common sense so stubbornly!

52.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 22, 2002, 00:19
52.
Re: No subject Jan 22, 2002, 00:19
Jan 22, 2002, 00:19
 
This thread is funny stuff I think my favorite is the response to the last part of the troll definition which reads 'There is no reason to respond...' There's some quality sophistry in here too. I think teh mane man should bone up on 'teh anglesh lanquach' though, or stick to a simpler style of writing. The 'I desperately want to sound intelligent' thing gets tedious pretty fast


This comment was edited on Jan 22, 00:20.
-Lutrosis
51.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 21, 2002, 22:11
anon@159.231
51.
Re: No subject Jan 21, 2002, 22:11
Jan 21, 2002, 22:11
anon@159.231
 
Generally I don't reply to these crazy threads I read, but I was perplexed how you can equate an ability to being a right. A right by this definition is 'anything in accordance with justice'. For example - to say it is my RIGHT to rape someone is to say that it is legally and morally acceptable, as it is a right to do such a thing.

Since neither is the case in Western Civilization, and ergo I would base your use of this word with the customs and laws of Western Civilization, it would not deem rape as a 'right'.

The most commonly used example would be 'It is my right to drive a car'. Well, you may have the ability to, but driving is not a right, it's a privledge that is alotted to you in today's society. You have the right to drive a car on your own land as it is private property, but you do not have the right to drive on communal roads without the proper licenses.
50.
 
Re:
Jan 19, 2002, 08:44
anon@216.150
50.
Re: Jan 19, 2002, 08:44
Jan 19, 2002, 08:44
anon@216.150
 
Unless this proves to be one of those games that has major bugs, incompatibility problems, or just plain too high system requirements for the launch date, it is sure to be a significant addition to the FPS game genre.

However, the glut of FPS games is not likely to let up, so the significance of GORE, both as game and technology, is reduced by association. Just another damned FPS game.
49.
 
No subject
Jan 19, 2002, 01:13
49.
No subject Jan 19, 2002, 01:13
Jan 19, 2002, 01:13
 
Heh, now that I think about it, I think it's quite funny.

-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
48.
 
LOL
Jan 19, 2002, 00:59
anon@168.100
48.
LOL Jan 19, 2002, 00:59
Jan 19, 2002, 00:59
anon@168.100
 
OMG yal spend all that time writting that shit like most ppl are going to read it,
47.
 
No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 16:28
47.
No subject Jan 18, 2002, 16:28
Jan 18, 2002, 16:28
 
Also, I have never stated that everyone else is emotional, because I am at times, too. I stated that others' emotions cause them to post irrational messages.

-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
46.
 
No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 15:49
46.
No subject Jan 18, 2002, 15:49
Jan 18, 2002, 15:49
 
It seems as though we have a misunderstand here. This is not the first time people have not read my comments thoroughly.

"Listen, I'm not going to argue with you. So far all you have proven to me is that nothing can change your mind"

It is not my mind that you can not change, is it logic that you can not change.

"and you belive that 1) everyone is wrong unless they agree with you, because you are always right, logical, and everyone else is emotional"

They are of course wrong, because you can not argue with logic. You can not argue with the fact that the number one is the number one, and that the earth you walk upon is a planet. These are facts that you can not argue with, and they are the same type of facts that I have provided, and that is why you can not argue with my comments.

"2)Rape is a right"

Rape is a right because rape is an ability. Rights are governed by governors of society (the police). I wish rape was not a right, but it is, unfortunately.

"3)Cheaters just need to be understood"

Misunderstandings can lead to confusion and unjust anger. Cheaters are people just like you, believe it or not. The world of computers does not reflect one's personal life, and if you believe that is not so, then you have become too acquainted with computers yourself.

"Your a Troll, definition or not, you bring nothing useful to this conversation with the exception of conflict and self proclaimed 'controversey'."

As I have said before, you provide no evidence that I am a troll, with or without quoting my exact posts. Conflict resolves from confusion and unjust anger, and because of that, you write without much sense, and bring to the conversation something that does not make sense. The self proclaimed 'controversy' is your confusion from your misunderstandings.

"I'll refrain from reply to your detritus, and hope that others will refrain from feeding the troll."

Since you will refrain from posting, that will relieve stress from others and myself. It does not matter what you may think of me, you provide no evidence that I am a troll, and because of that, your post has turned into senseless rubbish.

Come back with facts and maybe I'll take your post into consideration.

-----

Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice.
_____

The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.

The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve.
45.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 15:32
anon@216.227
45.
Re: No subject Jan 18, 2002, 15:32
Jan 18, 2002, 15:32
anon@216.227
 
Listen, I'm not going to argue with you. So far all you have proven to me is that nothing can change your mind, and you belive that 1) everyone is wrong unless they agree with you, because you are always right, logical, and everyone else is emotional 2)Rape is a right 3)Cheaters just need to be understood


Your a Troll, definition or not, you bring nothing useful to this conversation with the exception of conflict and self proclaimed 'controversey'.

I'll refrain from reply to your detritus, and hope that others will refrain from feeding the troll.
44.
 
No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 13:49
44.
No subject Jan 18, 2002, 13:49
Jan 18, 2002, 13:49
 
anon@62.30

"you might not be a troll, but you are a fuckin lamer..."

Well that's your opinion you're entitled to, and I respect that.

"sheesh, get a grip will ya and don't take things so bloody seriously!!!"

Actually, I have quite a grip. You know, I'm not that tense or serious about most matters. Sorry if it seemed that way.

"Go outside, get some fresh air, and whilst at it get a life too."

I'll take your suggestion some time, but it's pretty cold outside.

"How fuckin off topic is this thread !?!"

Sorry, just had to make a few points clear.

* * *

anon@195.198

"It doesn´t matter, you have NO evidence that he raped that girl and who ever says otherwise is lying, I know."

Who are you referring to and what does that have to do with this thread (sorry if I don't see whatever comedic value this posts conveys).

* * *

Definition supplied:

"troll

An electronic mail message, Usenet posting or other (electronic) communication which is intentionally incorrect, but not overtly controversial (compare flame bait), or the act of sending such a message."

This is not an e-mail or Usenet post. My posts are not intentionally incorrect, they are intentionally correct. These are controversial to the fact that the posts contradicted and corrected differ much from my posts.

anon@216.227

"Maybe your really just trying to start a flame war?"

No, I'm putting my point across.

"You say yourself you are controversal and you like to play on peoples emotions."

I am a controversial man, but never have I ever said that I play on people's emotions. You can quote me on that.

"And I thought I quoted the entire dictionary definition of 'right' and you said you where WRONG and it wasn't a RIGHT but a ABILITY to rape."

It's simple. If you can not understand what I had written one way I must try another method (in this case using the word 'ability'). No, I may have been wrong, but I had explained what it was in a later post.

"So now your backtracking to your 'rape is right' argument?"

No, I never backtracked, I tried to get my point across with another definition of 'rights'.

Second definition supplied:

"troll v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself."

I had no intention of posting for the sheer fact of a predictable response of discomfort.

"Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite."

Your discomfort is derived from the fact that you can not handle being wrong. This is normal.

"The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll."

These posts of mine have nothing to do with electronics knowledge. They has to do with reasoning and logic.

"If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it."

Rather, if you don't fall for the joke, you are fine and safe from discomfort.

"YHBT. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion."

No specious argument is to be had here from my point of view. These posts are not flames, they are not personal attacks, they corrections of posts. They are not intended to annoy anyone or disrupt any discussion (in which, there was none to be had, anyway).

"Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait."

There is no discussion or topic to be learnt when dealing with post correction.

"Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, 'Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll.'"

I find the author's definition to be quite jejune and unjustly.

"[Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners."

It seems as though the author has changed tone. There is no reason to respond to this passage.

"Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See also Troll-O-Meter."

I am not wrong in my arguments. There is no controversy to be had with factual statements, except with the controversial emotions of others.

43.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 12:07
anon@216.227
43.
Re: No subject Jan 18, 2002, 12:07
Jan 18, 2002, 12:07
anon@216.227
 

troll

An electronic mail message, Usenet posting or other (electronic) communication which is intentionally incorrect, but not overtly controversial (compare flame bait), or the act of sending such a message. Trolling aims to elicit an emotional reaction from those with a hair-trigger on the reply key. A really subtle troll makes some people lose their minds.

(1994-10-17)

Maybe your really just trying to start a flame war? You say yourself you are controversal and you like to play on peoples emotions.

And I thought I quoted the entire dictionary definition of 'right' and you said you where WRONG and it wasn't a RIGHT but a ABILITY to rape. So now your backtracking to your 'rape is right' argument?

how about this definition

troll v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." 3. [Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners.

Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See also Troll-O-Meter.

42.
 
Re: screw it...
Jan 18, 2002, 10:43
anon@207.18
42.
Re: screw it... Jan 18, 2002, 10:43
Jan 18, 2002, 10:43
anon@207.18
 
Chance--Dude I played the demo last night and it was really good...If you like fast deathmatching...I think the designers have done a good job...Its like they have taken everything good about the Multiplayer FPS genre and put them in one game... It looks like it is really easy to modify too...Every server was running its own version of the game...Kinda cool if you ask me...I will probably buy it...Seems like it is good LAN party material.

*sc4r4b to lazy to sign-in
41.
 
No subject
Jan 18, 2002, 09:43
anon@195.198
41.
No subject Jan 18, 2002, 09:43
Jan 18, 2002, 09:43
anon@195.198
 
It doesn´t matter, you have NO evidence that he raped that girl and who ever says otherwise is lying, I know.
60 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  ] Older