On RtCW Patch Installation

Activision's Caryn Law sends along an update to address questions she's received on a non-installer version of the just-released version 1.1 patch for Return to Castle Wolfenstein (story). Here's the deal:
Hey everyone,

Been following the forums post-update release and I'm seeing a lot about installation problems and a lot of people are asking me on ICQ about a non-install version of the patch.

There's no need: there is a link at the top of the readme that explains how to extract the files if you're having problems with the installer.

There's also info in the readme about what's compatible with what: those who've upgraded to 1.1 can play on 1.0 servers, but we encourage everyone to update so the multiplayer issues get fixed.

Thanks,
Caryn Law
View : : :
17.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 15, 2002, 12:42
17.
Re: No subject Jan 15, 2002, 12:42
Jan 15, 2002, 12:42
 
The readme was sent to the news sites with the location of the patch, attached to the email. Unfortunately, few chose to link to it. To Blues' credit, though, the readme was available on the download page.

This comment was edited on Jan 15, 12:46.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
2.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
anon@195.228
3.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
4.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
6.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
anon@24.6
7.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
anon@24.20
10.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
11.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
19.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
5.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
8.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
9.
Jan 14, 2002Jan 14 2002
anon@24.67
12.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
15.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
anon@24.91
24.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
27.
Jan 25, 2002Jan 25 2002
anon@213.229
13.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
anon@66.75
14.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
anon@66.75
16.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
anon@24.91
 17.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
  Re: No subject
18.
Jan 15, 2002Jan 15 2002
anon@66.157
26.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
anon@63.14
20.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.247
21.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@198.139
22.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.91
23.
Jan 16, 2002Jan 16 2002
anon@24.190
25.
Jan 17, 2002Jan 17 2002
   Re: #23
anon@63.14