Out of the Blue

It is with fascination that I read the extensive thread that's popped up as a result of the posting of the single-player Medal of Honor demo yesterday. Frans has already made a lengthy post explaining what we did and why we did it, so I won't go further into that, but I will say that I am sort of pleased to see the debate that centered around whether we were doing the right thing or not in this case, since we actually do exert a lot of effort here to try and avoid coloring outside the lines (which some feel posting this demo qualifies as), and it's reassuring to see so many of you feel this is an important effort to make (though we certainly are a bit surprised at some of the motives that have been attributed to us here considering the efforts we take in this regard). Anyway, regardless of your opinions on this subject, your feedback is appreciated.

Link of the Day: Worthless word for the day. Thanks Zdim.
Bonus Link: The Massachusetts State Lottery Winning # for 12/31/01. Thanks MDG.
Wild Science: NASA satellite pair to tackle weighty task. Thanks Jamie Fullerton.

View : : :
34.
 
Re: heheheh ok, sorry
Jan 3, 2002, 07:21
34.
Re: heheheh ok, sorry Jan 3, 2002, 07:21
Jan 3, 2002, 07:21
 
Are we all sniffing glue here or what? What does "billion" have to do with a hundred million? What kind of a fraction is 1/9?

I'll let you in on a little joke here. When I see the "One Ninth of a Billion", it reminds me of McDonalds. You know...Billions and Billions served. He's poking fun at his sites importance. Do you get it? If not, loosen up! Life is too short to get so warped over something like that.

Nope, I will accept no responsibility that misinterpretation other than being duped by something that was designed to do just that. Why do I even have to defend that? It's so obviously 1) misleading and 2) irrelevant to the "piracy".

Admiting that you were wrong on one point does not lessen your argument. Failing/refusing to admit that fault does make you look like a jerk however.






Snappy2Stroke

--Your ideas intrigue me and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.
This comment was edited on Jan 3, 07:24.
-TPFKAS2S
Avatar 10139
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@199.221
2.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.78
3.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
4.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@195.92
14.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
5.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
11.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
18.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
19.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
21.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
29.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
6.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
9.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
12.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
15.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
16.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
38.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@213.1
7.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
8.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@151.201
10.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
13.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
20.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@213.51
28.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
17.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@207.217
22.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@213.105
23.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
24.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@128.205
25.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@64.218
27.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@64.218
26.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@165.121
30.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
31.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
32.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
33.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
 34.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
    Re: heheheh ok, sorry
35.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
36.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@198.182
37.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@204.201
39.
Jan 4, 2002Jan 4 2002
40.
Jan 4, 2002Jan 4 2002
41.
Jan 8, 2002Jan 8 2002