Out of the Blue

It is with fascination that I read the extensive thread that's popped up as a result of the posting of the single-player Medal of Honor demo yesterday. Frans has already made a lengthy post explaining what we did and why we did it, so I won't go further into that, but I will say that I am sort of pleased to see the debate that centered around whether we were doing the right thing or not in this case, since we actually do exert a lot of effort here to try and avoid coloring outside the lines (which some feel posting this demo qualifies as), and it's reassuring to see so many of you feel this is an important effort to make (though we certainly are a bit surprised at some of the motives that have been attributed to us here considering the efforts we take in this regard). Anyway, regardless of your opinions on this subject, your feedback is appreciated.

Link of the Day: Worthless word for the day. Thanks Zdim.
Bonus Link: The Massachusetts State Lottery Winning # for 12/31/01. Thanks MDG.
Wild Science: NASA satellite pair to tackle weighty task. Thanks Jamie Fullerton.

View : : :
22.
 
LOL
Jan 2, 2002, 21:04
anon@213.105
22.
LOL Jan 2, 2002, 21:04
Jan 2, 2002, 21:04
anon@213.105
 
It's not for us to wonder about the legality of posting a demo... it's for Blue to worry about [and I doubt he's worried]. NEway, all that is important to us is that the demo has been released... do I care if it's fallen of the back of a website or travelled air mail via Austria to a secret web server in Asia.... NO!

Don't get all stuck up about copying Bluesnews with your own ads... even if you did no-one would visit so go right ahead and do it! It's an empty threat.

Don't forget to compare this to Creative who force you to purchase a CD [costs like 2$ or something] if you want your new Audigy or SB!Live to work on Windows XP... they decided not to use the web to distribute drivers anymore. How pathetic. Part of the costs of running a piece of hardware should include the bandwidth for hosting the drivers... even if it was a free CD it is hastle non-the-less.

"If freakin teenagers on IRC are going to get arrested for piracy"

If they broke the law they should pay for it... we're not talking like 'I just downloaded ONE free game then I got busted', it's more like 'I was distributing 300gb of warez a day'. But do you honestly see Blue getting in trouble over this or the magazine causing a fuss... NO!

The most important thing is this... some of the largest gaming sites have shut down recently because they can't make enough money... most people do these sort of websites as a hobby and lots INVEST money into it for no return. Just look at the problems www.neowin.net has had recently because no-one will host them [too many hits... luckily a good service provider came along] but it really isn't easy or cheap hosting a PROPER website. This isn't a free 30mb webspace website that you see plenty of.

PS - I must register sometime because anonymous posters just don't have the same impact as registered ones.

-mortensenj
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@199.221
2.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.78
3.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
4.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@195.92
14.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
5.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
11.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
18.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
19.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
21.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
29.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
6.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
9.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
12.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
15.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
16.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@208.241
38.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@213.1
7.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
8.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@151.201
10.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
13.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
20.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@213.51
28.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
17.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@207.217
 22.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
LOL
anon@213.105
23.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@216.26
24.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@128.205
25.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@64.218
27.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@64.218
26.
Jan 2, 2002Jan 2 2002
anon@165.121
30.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
31.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
32.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
33.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@216.26
34.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
35.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
36.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@198.182
37.
Jan 3, 2002Jan 3 2002
anon@204.201
39.
Jan 4, 2002Jan 4 2002
40.
Jan 4, 2002Jan 4 2002
41.
Jan 8, 2002Jan 8 2002