Diablo II & Privacy

There's a post on PlanetDiablo from Blizzard Entertainment, describing plans for a patch that includes a feature that "is likely become quite controversial despite the company's efforts to explain exactly why it is being implemented." Here's the word:
This week, Blizzard will be releasing Diablo II patch 1.09c. The patch adds a new feature to the program that is important, but also has the potential to be misunderstood [...].

Included in the patch is a .dll file that will relay non-personal, non-identifying information about a user's computer to Blizzard. Specifically: CPU, RAM, operating system, video card and sound card information.

Historically, the best customers for Blizzard games are players of previous Blizzard games, and while it's tempting to go for high-end specifications with our upcoming Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos to get the maximum amount of bells and whistles out of it, we also want it to be playable by as many of our current customers as we can, and so we're going to compile this information for that purpose.

Two important things to note [...]: 1) this is only taking place in North America, and 2) users can opt out of participating in this hardware specification survey when they download the patch.

We understand that user privacy is an important matter to our customers, and are attempting to balance privacy needs with the best means possible of accurately ascertaining current users' hardware information.
View : : :
35.
 
No biggie
Nov 14, 2001, 07:48
35.
No biggie Nov 14, 2001, 07:48
Nov 14, 2001, 07:48
 
If it's really going to be that simple to opt out of the survey, this shouldn't be too controversial. I've never been put out as a result of anything Blizzard's done, so I'm going to be a naive, ignorant soul.

Hey Blizzard! I have a Duron 750, 256 RAM, running winxp with a geforce 2 gts and a soundblaster live.

How, exactly, is letting Blizzard know this a problem?

Announcing this is probably just a CYA routine. On the Battle.net forums, Bill Roper can't take a piss without someone complaining about it.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@209.251
3.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@130.18
5.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
7.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.27
15.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
17.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.18
6.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@198.60
8.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.104
11.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@194.205
26.
Nov 12, 2001Nov 12 2001
anon@216.231
27.
Nov 12, 2001Nov 12 2001
anon@130.18
28.
Nov 13, 2001Nov 13 2001
anon@137.229
29.
Nov 13, 2001Nov 13 2001
anon@209.179
30.
Nov 13, 2001Nov 13 2001
anon@130.18
2.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@209.96
4.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@213.162
9.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.159
10.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.159
13.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@194.205
14.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@63.142
16.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
19.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
20.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@132.156
21.
Nov 7, 2001Nov 7 2001
anon@24.12
22.
Nov 8, 2001Nov 8 2001
anon@206.246
23.
Nov 8, 2001Nov 8 2001
anon@206.246
24.
Nov 8, 2001Nov 8 2001
anon@207.51
25.
Nov 12, 2001Nov 12 2001
anon@64.166
31.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
anon@24.67
32.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
anon@213.59
34.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
anon@164.58
 35.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
No biggie
36.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
anon@24.69
37.
Nov 14, 2001Nov 14 2001
anon@194.128