Out of the Blue

I have my new coffee grinder, so that's a relief. I got a separate kitchen scale as well to be precise with my ratios, since the scale-grinder that broke is an unusual combo. But revisiting ratio guidelines again has me mystified (again). According to online sources, the proper ratio of water to beans for a Chemex pour over maker like I use is around 16:1. My kettle holds 1.5 liters, and my calculator tells me that calls for 93 grams of beans. This is the same confusion I hit last time I looked into this, because despite that guidance, after experimenting, we landed on 50 grams of beans. This should be extremely weak according to the internet, but it's not, and we do like strong coffee. I'm almost certain that answer is obvious, and I'm still grinding my beans too finely. The coffee is good as it is. But there is a trace of bitterness, which supports the idea that I'm over-extracting, as the experts say. So I'll experiment with this more. It's hard to imagine a courser grind could allow me to use almost twice as much coffee, but you never know.

Ground-up Round-up
Thanks Ant, Neutronbeam, and Max.

Breakfast Links

Science

Media

Creature Features

View : : :
9 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
9.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 19:27
9.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 19:27
Mar 18, 2025, 19:27
 
Yeah, Daybreakers is on my guilty pleasure list too. Probably seen it half a dozen times or so. Chronicles of Riddick too -- probably see that a dozen times. It has one of my favorite movie lines, "I hate not being the bad guys!"
“If you think adventure is dangerous, try routine. It is lethal". -- Paulo Coelho
8.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 14:46
8.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 14:46
Mar 18, 2025, 14:46
 
A few of those 'flopbuster' titles weren't all that bad and in the case of Equilibrium can your movie really flop when it never gets a real release? A few of the movies it would be interesting to see what went wrong like Priest and Gamer as the former had decent source material and the latter just went off the rails in a bad way. Death Race and Doomsday are definitely guilty pleasure titles for me as they're not really good, but fun to watch.

Chronicles of Riddick is 100% what you get when a studio/money people start messing with the movie. They didn't want it to be rated R because it would "limit the audience". Their focus groups also came to the conclusion they had to remove all of the Furya flashbacks because they were "confusing" despite that giving context to his motivation. I'm sure there was more, but that's all I remember from when I dived in to finding out what happened because the movie didn't seem right when I first saw it.
7.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 13:59
7.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 13:59
Mar 18, 2025, 13:59
 
I really enjoyed Paycheck. It wasn't bad at all in my opinion.
6.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 13:46
6.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 13:46
Mar 18, 2025, 13:46
 
Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster - Polygon.
I'm all for it. Most of the movies on that list are quality "turn your brain off and just have fun" popcorn flicks.
Avatar 58038
5.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 13:38
5.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 13:38
Mar 18, 2025, 13:38
 
Really liked daybreakers and dredd.

It's really too bad we didn't get another dredd.
Avatar 57660
4.
 
Re: Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster
Mar 18, 2025, 13:21
4.
Re: Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster Mar 18, 2025, 13:21
Mar 18, 2025, 13:21
 
Burrito of Peace wrote on Mar 18, 2025, 12:02:
Adding to what TFP said, Priest was great, as was Dredd, Equilibrium, The Chronicles of Riddick, and even Death Race. The latter jettisons the goofy camp of the original and makes it an awesome, loud, bombastic blend of cars and guns. What's not to love?

However, missing from the list is Pandorum which is criminally underrated and underwatched, Event Horizon (though technically a 1997 release, I'd argue that it was the jumping off point for the 2000s flopbuster sci-fi era), Cargo, Timeline and Mission to Mars. There are probably a dozen more I could list that were expected to be blockbusters but ended up as flopbusters but were still enjoyable films nonetheless.

Oh yeah, Pandorum was a surprising movie when I first saw it. Went into it not knowing what to expect. Need to put that on my rewatch list.
DEI hire? Oh how cute, you think you found a way of being a racist without sounding racist. That's adorable!
Avatar 22380
3.
 
Re: OotB: Same old grind
Mar 18, 2025, 12:29
3.
Re: OotB: Same old grind Mar 18, 2025, 12:29
Mar 18, 2025, 12:29
 
I'm almost certain that answer is obvious, and I'm still grinding my beans too finely.
Paper filters with Chemex are suppose to be thicker than 'traditional' drip filters. That extra thickness allows for a more coarse grind without a dramatic swing in flow rate (therefore less impact to extraction).
So I think your hunch is right about grinding too finely.
2.
 
Re: Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster
Mar 18, 2025, 12:02
2.
Re: Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster Mar 18, 2025, 12:02
Mar 18, 2025, 12:02
 
Adding to what TFP said, Priest was great, as was Dredd, Equilibrium, The Chronicles of Riddick, and even Death Race. The latter jettisons the goofy camp of the original and makes it an awesome, loud, bombastic blend of cars and guns. What's not to love?

However, missing from the list is Pandorum which is criminally underrated and underwatched, Event Horizon (though technically a 1997 release, I'd argue that it was the jumping off point for the 2000s flopbuster sci-fi era), Cargo, Timeline and Mission to Mars. There are probably a dozen more I could list that were expected to be blockbusters but ended up as flopbusters but were still enjoyable films nonetheless.

"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.

“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
Avatar 21247
1.
 
Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster
Mar 18, 2025, 11:40
1.
Bring back the 2000s-era sci-fi flopbuster Mar 18, 2025, 11:40
Mar 18, 2025, 11:40
 
I was stoked to see Daybreakers on that list - it's one of my guilty pleasures. It was a VERY different idea for a vampire movie. The plot: It's 10 years after a plague that made 95% of all humans on the planet into vampires. Life, and corporate America goes on. Starbucks sells coffee with blood in it instead of cream. People work in office buildings with the windows blacked out and take tunnels and subways. People drive to work in cars with blacked out windows using a VR driving system, The few remaining real humans are owned by pharmaceutical companies who keep them alive in comas, while harvesting their blood.

But all is not well. The supply of blood is inadequate and one pharmaceutical company (whose CEO is Sam Neill) is trying to develop an artificial blood to make up for the demand (and make massive profits of course). One of the hematologists working on the artificial blood project (Ethan Hawke), a vampire who feels guilty about the plight of the humans, accidently crosses paths with some humans living in the wild, being hunted by the army and led by William Defoe. In the process he discovers clues to a possible cure for the vampire virus but, of course, the powerful pharmaceutical company, and vampire governments, are not interested in a cure, but in maintaining the status quo. In fact, since the artificial blood project may never go anywhere, why not use the cure to turn some vampires into humans to feed the rest of the vampires?

It's a fun movie with a very original take on vampires.

This comment was edited on Mar 18, 2025, 13:18.
DEI hire? Oh how cute, you think you found a way of being a racist without sounding racist. That's adorable!
Avatar 22380
9 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older