JTW wrote on Mar 2, 2025, 20:44:
I really wish Epic hadn't screwed it up. They don't need to be Steam (not every front end needs to be an everything-including-the-kitchen-sink utility suite), but what they have needs to be functional, and have the tools related to that functionality.
Because in the end, Epic was right about one thing: Having a Steam monopoly isn't a great thing, and it's likely to bite us all in the ass eventually.
Oh, they could still compete if they focused on platform features and merit—actually building something better than Steam. But as we've seen with Epic's antics—whether it's the way they've handled EGS or their attempt to side-load a mobile payment processor—they have no interest in taking the long, difficult road. Instead, they'd rather strong-arm their way to dominance through exclusivity deals or piggyback off the hard work Apple and Google have already built.
Ever since Epic Games Store launched, I've had zero respect for Tim's direction, and if that platform ever crumbles into nothing, I won't shed a tear. Maybe one day, a company with solid business acumen, a genuine desire to compete on merit, and a real understanding of how not to alienate PC gamers will come along and challenge Steam the right way. I'd welcome that day. I've always been for genuine merit-based competition. It's good for us.
This comment was edited on Mar 3, 2025, 03:59.
The most exercise some people get is jumping to conclusions.