Out of the Blue

I was never an elite gamer, even back when my reflexes were a trifle sharper than they are these days. But I can recognize when responsiveness and latency in its various forms affect gameplay, since even the lamest among us can cry "lag" when appropriate (or plausible). So after getting positive results from a recent tweaking session to improve my system's responsiveness, I can't help but be drawn in by the hype of these new(ish) hall effect keyboards that all the kids are talking about. I guess it's time to try one out, especially since evaluations suggest you don't need to be a pro to appreciate the benefits of their innovations. A complication is I'd want it to also serve for work as well as play, and many of them are compact and/or tenkeyless. So yeah, I want a full-sized model. Okay, maybe not this full-sized (though I wouldn't rule it out). I also tend to prefer dedicated macro keys, but since there are macro solutions that are 100% software, I won't view that as a deal-breaker. Feel free to offer suggestions and I'll follow up at some point with my results.

Key Round-up
Thanks Ant, Neutronbeam, and Max.

Play

Breakfast Link

Stories

Science

Image

Follow-up

The Funnies

View : : :
11.
 
Re: OotB: Key decision
Feb 5, 2025, 20:48
WarPig
 
11.
Re: OotB: Key decision Feb 5, 2025, 20:48
Feb 5, 2025, 20:48
 WarPig
 
Who wants to learn about packaging french fries! Nobody? Too bad!

It's time for WarPig's TMI story hour!

I've worked in the packaging equipment industry since 1987 (yeah, I'm old), and much of it has been for french fries. As far as french fry plants go, I've designed and built baggers, case openers, and case packers - much of it for Lamb Weston (the other big companies in the USA and Canada are McCain Foods, Simplot, and Ore Ida - and we've built machines for all of them). As a matter of fact, I worked on a Lamb Weston project today. This is why I'm really surprised that I haven't heard this news before now.

A lot of the individual packaging lines package nothing but unlabeled retail bags that get sent out to restaurants, and these bags look like brown paper bags. Of course there are things that make the paper itself challenging - one, the grease can't soak through the bag, and two, the bag needs to be able to be sealed quickly and securely with heat.

As far as creating the bag goes, the baggers for the retail bags (usually 6lbs. per bag), run at around 50-60 bags per minute. So, you need to be able to seal the bag, fill it with 6lbs. of product, and have the seal cool down enough to support the weight of the product without bursting open - all within one second. So, this is why they can't just use paper - it has to be coated with something that's food-safe but melts together to form a strong bond.

One of the reasons this new paper is interesting to me (and probably no one else here ) is that it must already work with existing baggers, because if it didn't, I definitely would have already known about it. Back in the day when trans-fats were banned, the new oils would soak through the paper, and the new paper the industry came up with didn't seal like the old paper. So they had to keep working on that while equipment manufacturers worked on new sealing jaws.

If you want to get a feel for the scale of french fry production... around 15 years ago, we built one of our case packers and leased it to a french fry plant. We were a newish company at the time and the customer didn't want to commit to more than the one machine without proof that we knew what we were doing. We had a counter in the program to let both the customer and us know what the machine had done in a year. All this machine does is pack six, 6 lb. bags into a cardboard box - so, 36 lbs. of fries per box. After a year, that one machine had packed over one million cases. The customer ended up buying that machine and ordered four more, and that's just one packaging line in that one plant. So yeah, that's a lot of spuds!

Avatar 1750
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 5, 12:56Feb 5 12:56
2.
Feb 5, 13:01Feb 5 13:01
3.
Feb 5, 13:25Feb 5 13:25
4.
Feb 5, 15:21Feb 5 15:21
7.
Feb 5, 17:56Feb 5 17:56
8.
Feb 5, 18:31Feb 5 18:31
10.
Feb 5, 19:18Feb 5 19:18
9.
Feb 5, 18:32Feb 5 18:32
 11.
Feb 5, 20:48Feb 5 20:48
Re: OotB: Key decision
12.
Feb 5, 21:10Feb 5 21:10
14.
Feb 5, 21:29Feb 5 21:29
15.
Feb 6, 02:47Feb 6 02:47
13.
Feb 5, 21:15Feb 5 21:15
16.
Feb 6, 08:37Feb 6 08:37
17.
Feb 6, 09:07Feb 6 09:07
18.
Feb 6, 12:52Feb 6 12:52