These days anyone can email one of the less scrupulous rumor-oriented websites, say they're an insider and get a story posted about something going on at Sierra.
But that doesn't make it true. Unfortunately, when every other website runs a story about a rumor posted on another site, the public assumes that means the rumor has been "confirmed," even though it's really just the same story.
It's really impossible for us to get ahead of this particular rumor because the rumor itself is based on information that is not true.
We have not cancelled Homeworld 2.
We have not released Relic from their contract.
We have not made any sort of statement about Homeworld 2.
The negotiations with Relic regarding Homeworld 2 (which actually started long before E3) are completely divorced from the recent restructuring at Sierra.
If someone at Relic thinks the above things are true then they are mistaken. And there's no way we can predict when someone at Relic is going to contact one of you guys and say the things above.
Hopefully you can understand the situation we're in. It's hard to make a "statement" about things that aren't true, except to say that they're not true.
Where was Homeworld 2?
Sequel to Relic's smash debut missed its planned E3 appearance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The teaser site led everyone to believe that Homeworld 2 would make its world debut at this year's E3, but if you go there now all you'll see is a sign-up page for future information. We asked Sierra's Adam Kahn about the discrepancy, who told us that the game hit a last minute snag and really wasn't ready for the public to see. Look for the first details on this anticipated title in the next few weeks - once the team recovers from the sound and fury of this year's show.
I think you mistoook something there.... Relic never indicated Homeworld 2 wasn't shown at E3 because of bugs. They never said anything about it at all.I've seen it. I'll search for the article.
As we now publicly know, Sierra and Relic began "reviewing" their contracts prior to E3, and that information was not provided at E3 for those reasons.So you're assuming they lied?
The site is called GamaSutra I believe, although a search of their site doesn't reveal a post-mortem article about Homeworld..Right, we never covered a Homeworld post-mortem, on Gamasutra or any other site, so perhaps it never appeared online but only in Game Developer Magazine or somesuch?