4 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
4.
 
Re: Quoteworthy
Oct 1, 2024, 17:49
4.
Re: Quoteworthy Oct 1, 2024, 17:49
Oct 1, 2024, 17:49
 
It's funny considering they don't care about their own lore anyway. Although colour me surprised if there aren't a few ankle fetishists at GW who can't keep it contained to the bedroom and want to bring it into work.
3.
 
Re: Quoteworthy
Oct 1, 2024, 16:46
3.
Re: Quoteworthy Oct 1, 2024, 16:46
Oct 1, 2024, 16:46
 
Zerg wrote on Oct 1, 2024, 12:05:
Or maybe they just don't want rabid "fans" to give them crap about it.

You know, this IP really validates the fact that "fans" is a short form of "fanatics". I can only imagine the posts on social media such an error would trigger.
None at all, the Warhammer community always has bigger things to be dramatic about and they're not overly keen on Games Workshop as a rule.
2.
 
Re: Quoteworthy
Oct 1, 2024, 14:40
2.
Re: Quoteworthy Oct 1, 2024, 14:40
Oct 1, 2024, 14:40
 
Zerg wrote on Oct 1, 2024, 12:05:
Or maybe they just don't want rabid "fans" to give them crap about it.

You know, this IP really validates the fact that "fans" is a short form of "fanatics". I can only imagine the posts on social media such an error would trigger.
I'd bet you're right about this one... especially if you look at all the shovelware that has had the WH40K IP.
1.
 
Re: Quoteworthy
Oct 1, 2024, 12:05
Zerg
 
1.
Re: Quoteworthy Oct 1, 2024, 12:05
Oct 1, 2024, 12:05
 Zerg
 
Or maybe they just don't want rabid "fans" to give them crap about it.

You know, this IP really validates the fact that "fans" is a short form of "fanatics". I can only imagine the posts on social media such an error would trigger.
Avatar 60406
4 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older