Saturday Metaverse [Sep 07, 2024, 10:14 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
She still has her onlyfans account right?
Her and the doctor should team up and do a podcast.
I expect the doc's account will be banned again before you know it. But being demonetized is the kicker.
I expect the doc's account will be banned again before you know it. But being demonetized is the kicker.
I'm guessing she is way too old for him for him to be interested in her.
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 13:06:
I'm guessing she is way too old for him for him to be interested in her.
She will be an earner long after the world has forgotten about him.
Well at least we know Amouranth probably wasn't banned for sexting little girls.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
We both probably can guess the two reasons she was banned...
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Well, I'm sure she'll go home to cry into her huge pile of money. Then go right back out and make another pile making more porn. At this point for someone like her I'm sure she could care less about YT.
“With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." - Aaron Sati
Cutter wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 17:08:
could care less
C'mon Cutter, you're smarter than this... right?
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 15:32:
We both probably can guess the two reasons she was banned...
don't understand why she's so popular. she's not even THAT hot XD
Sepharo wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 18:16:Cutter wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 17:08:
could care less
C'mon Cutter, you're smarter than this... right?
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
I don't understand why she's so popular. she's not even THAT hot XD
I don't know, she is hot to me. Then again my standards have dropped to "she has a pulse and she didn't run screaming at the sight of me." But I'm not going to waste time watching her or anyone else on YouTube if the only thing they have going for them is being all sexy.
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
Did you just see my "well actually..." and raise me a "well technically..."?!?
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:29:Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
Except nobody says it in such a way that such a usage would be correct; they would have to say "I could care less...". People only ever say "I could care less" when they are implying that they could not care less... which is just wrong. Irregardless, this has been a stimulating discussion.
Steam + PSN: PHJF
It will be a hit to her revenue stream, but probably minor compared to how much money she makes through Twitch and Onlyfans - ergo, she'll care but not that much. So, point in fact, she could care less.
“With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." - Aaron Sati
It's almost as if monopolies result in capricious and arbitrary behavior by the monopoly company.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:48:
Did you just see my "well actually..." and raise me a "well technically..."?!?
<Grins>
Maaaaaaaaybe...
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
PHJF wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 22:14:Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:29:Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
Except nobody says it in such a way that such a usage would be correct; they would have to say "I could care less...". People only ever say "I could care less" when they are implying that they could not care less... which is just wrong. Irregardless, this has been a stimulating discussion.
after all that you just casually throw in an 'irregardless'?!? *shivers* makes me wanna puke just typing it.
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
Rimmer: “Step up to Red Alert.”
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
1badmf wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 00:28:
after all that you just casually throw in an 'irregardless'?!? *shivers* makes me wanna puke just typing it.
I have never typed it before (much less spoken it), so it was in interesting experiment.
Steam + PSN: PHJF
irregardless of what everyone might think
From Webster's
It made its first appearance on Blue's News in 2001. I say we start a trend and make it generally acceptable
From Webster's
Irregardless was popularized in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its increasingly widespread spoken use called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance.
It made its first appearance on Blue's News in 2001. I say we start a trend and make it generally acceptable
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 24 January 2025, 11:26.