Saturday Metaverse [Sep 07, 2024, 11:14 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
Show me tits worth talking about and I will. I've seen Amouranth's tits, they're not worth the effort to talk about outside of dismissing them out of hand.
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 08:50:ZeroPike1 wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 04:35:
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
We wanted to talk about something actually interesting, I guess.
HA! You are not wrong there.
Rimmer: “Step up to Red Alert.”
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
I have always found it fascinating that language evolves faster then humans do. I also think it's interesting how for most adults learning a new language is significantly harder then it was when they were kids. I would think that a fully developed brain would have the edge. Lastly, accents, and how some people seem to be able to just pick them up and drop them without an issue and others can barely do their own accent consistently. The human brain and language is a fascinating subject.
also: bewbs.
also: bewbs.
No comment on bewbs though? I am disappoint.
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Prez wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 12:23:Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 08:50:ZeroPike1 wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 04:35:
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
We wanted to talk about something actually interesting, I guess.
It is a very poignant illustration of the duality of man; the dichotomy of intellectualism that exists in all of us, ergo it is in fact a quality discussion I daresay.
In other words, it's cool to be enraged by "irregardless" and "could care less" but still appreciate bewbs. Or cock n' balz; we shant discriminate here.
I'm actually a strong believer in the active evolution of language, that "English has no rules" other than usage, and an enthusiastic user of creative and proscribed usages.
I just know Cutter probably isn't, so was ribbing him.
I literally think about this alot and irregardless of what your 7th grade teacher says, think it's all cromulent and embiggens our discourse.
Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 08:50:ZeroPike1 wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 04:35:
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
We wanted to talk about something actually interesting, I guess.
It is a very poignant illustration of the duality of man; the dichotomy of intellectualism that exists in all of us, ergo it is in fact a quality discussion I daresay.
In other words, it's cool to be enraged by "irregardless" and "could care less" but still appreciate bewbs. Or cock n' balz; we shant discriminate here.
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
The Flying Penguin wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 10:39:You must be a fellow man of culture to share such things.
Bizarre double standard, when there are several dozen of channels of women wearing transparent lingerie, usually changing in front of the camera, for what is purported to be fashion modeling. Most of these ladies also have OnlyFans accounts with, I presume, far more spicier videos. A quick search will bring up hundreds of videos:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=transparent+4k+2024+try+on
I enjoy watching these, so I have no problem with them. I don't really follow Amouranth's channel, but I don't think she's ever posted anything as overtly sexual as some of these videos.
*tips hat*
Bizarre double standard, when there are several dozen of channels of women wearing transparent lingerie, usually changing in front of the camera, for what is purported to be fashion modeling. Most of these ladies also have OnlyFans accounts with, I presume, far more spicier videos. A quick search will bring up hundreds of videos:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=transparent+4k+2024+try+on
I enjoy watching these, so I have no problem with them. I don't really follow Amouranth's channel, but I don't think she's ever posted anything as overtly sexual as some of these videos.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=transparent+4k+2024+try+on
I enjoy watching these, so I have no problem with them. I don't really follow Amouranth's channel, but I don't think she's ever posted anything as overtly sexual as some of these videos.
"I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes."
- Joanna Maciejewska
- Joanna Maciejewska
ZeroPike1 wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 04:35:
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
We wanted to talk about something actually interesting, I guess.
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
jdreyer wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 22:32:I've been saying for years that content creators need legislation to protect them and/or should form unions. Youtube would have zero income without them, but Youtube, Amazon, etc. can block/fire anyone at any time for any reason, and they don't even have to provide a reason or any way at all for the person to appeal. This is a legit industry even if people love to mock it, with people basing their livelihoods off of it, and they have zero rights. Many a banned by bots who made mistakes and getting it reversed can be impossible. The regulation of the content is entirely arbitrary.
It's almost as if monopolies result in capricious and arbitrary behavior by the monopoly company.
irregardless of what everyone might think
From Webster's
It made its first appearance on Blue's News in 2001. I say we start a trend and make it generally acceptable
From Webster's
Irregardless was popularized in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its increasingly widespread spoken use called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance.
It made its first appearance on Blue's News in 2001. I say we start a trend and make it generally acceptable
1badmf wrote on Sep 8, 2024, 00:28:
after all that you just casually throw in an 'irregardless'?!? *shivers* makes me wanna puke just typing it.
I have never typed it before (much less spoken it), so it was in interesting experiment.
Steam + PSN: PHJF
How did the topic of Amouranth turn into an English grammar lesson? Well at least she bring out the intellectuals in you all.
Rimmer: “Step up to Red Alert.”
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
Kryten: “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
ALSO: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
PHJF wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 22:14:Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:29:Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
Except nobody says it in such a way that such a usage would be correct; they would have to say "I could care less...". People only ever say "I could care less" when they are implying that they could not care less... which is just wrong. Irregardless, this has been a stimulating discussion.
after all that you just casually throw in an 'irregardless'?!? *shivers* makes me wanna puke just typing it.
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:48:
Did you just see my "well actually..." and raise me a "well technically..."?!?
<Grins>
Maaaaaaaaybe...
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
It's almost as if monopolies result in capricious and arbitrary behavior by the monopoly company.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
It will be a hit to her revenue stream, but probably minor compared to how much money she makes through Twitch and Onlyfans - ergo, she'll care but not that much. So, point in fact, she could care less.
"Van Gogh painted alone and in despair and in madness and sold one picture in his entire life. Millions struggled alone, unrecognized, and struggled as heroically as any famous hero. Was it worthless? I knew it wasn't."
Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 21:29:Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
Except nobody says it in such a way that such a usage would be correct; they would have to say "I could care less...". People only ever say "I could care less" when they are implying that they could not care less... which is just wrong. Irregardless, this has been a stimulating discussion.
Steam + PSN: PHJF
Did you just see my "well actually..." and raise me a "well technically..."?!?
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."
Prez wrote on Sep 7, 2024, 20:24:
Well actually (don't you hate when people say that?) despite being grammatically incorrect, it is an acceptable colloquialism.
Technically, it is grammatically correct. Because "could care less" indicates a position in which the speaker does care to an extent but the amount of care has the potential to be reduced.
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2024 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 15 October 2024, 11:21.