31.
 
Re: Engagement Ring
Feb 10, 2024, 19:08
31.
Re: Engagement Ring Feb 10, 2024, 19:08
Feb 10, 2024, 19:08
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Feb 10, 2024, 17:47:
GothicWizard wrote on Feb 10, 2024, 14:29:
Prez wrote on Feb 9, 2024, 19:06:
For the life of me I will never understand why writers think that this is big news about a single player game. It's not a live service, and it has an end. It was released 5 months ago. I can't think of one single player game that I was playing 5 months straight after release. My favorite game of all time, XCOM 2, had me playing about 2 straight months before I took a break from it.

Please explain to me why a 10 yr old SP game (Skyrim SE and FO4) has at least twice the number of players than this one by your logic.

Also BG3 is still over 110,000 players and just as old and SP.

*grabs popcorn*

BG3 has 160k right now, it's called a weekend Still insanely high numbers for a game of this type no matter what.
Skyrim SE = 30k
Starfield = 10k
CS2 = 7k
CS1 = 8k (lmao)

Funfact, I too am playing CS1 right now... still hoping CS2 will catch up but doesn't look like it, the last videos by content creators where disastercity for the developers. Half the simulation doesn't even WORK.

Full transparency; when I looked last a week ago, on a weekday it was ~115K for BG3 so I used that number knowing it would be at least that. Irrelevant what time of the week you want to take a snapshot of BG3 about as old, a SP game is at LEAST 11 times the players vs SF. That's my overall point, so I take issue with his logic. It's clearly none of the variables he brings up. It's the one he wants to avoid, it's just a bad fucking game that most everyone got tired of quick.

And to all the 'modders will save it' brigade, I suppose you missed the multiple articles of several big name BGS modders walking away from SF claiming it's fundamentally broken and not worth the effort. According to Nexus numbers as I type this while they each about about the same amount of mods (SF a bit more) BG3 has 3x the downloads. Shows which community is more active, interested.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 9, 19:06Feb 9 19:06
3.
Feb 9, 20:28Feb 9 20:28
4.
Feb 9, 20:41Feb 9 20:41
5.
Feb 9, 20:49Feb 9 20:49
8.
Feb 9, 22:22Feb 9 22:22
9.
Feb 9, 22:31Feb 9 22:31
10.
Feb 9, 22:55Feb 9 22:55
11.
Feb 9, 22:59Feb 9 22:59
13.
Feb 9, 23:12Feb 9 23:12
15.
Feb 10, 09:39Feb 10 09:39
16.
Feb 10, 10:18Feb 10 10:18
17.
Feb 10, 10:46Feb 10 10:46
19.
Feb 10, 11:01Feb 10 11:01
20.
Feb 10, 11:40Feb 10 11:40
21.
Feb 10, 12:11Feb 10 12:11
22.
Feb 10, 12:37Feb 10 12:37
37.
Feb 11, 10:55Feb 11 10:55
       Re: Engagement Ring
38.
Feb 11, 11:30Feb 11 11:30
        Re: Engagement Ring
39.
Feb 11, 12:12Feb 11 12:12
         Re: Engagement Ring
40.
Feb 11, 12:43Feb 11 12:43
          Re: Engagement Ring
41.
Feb 11, 13:06Feb 11 13:06
           Re: Engagement Ring
42.
Feb 11, 13:27Feb 11 13:27
         Re: Engagement Ring
47.
Feb 14, 09:47Feb 14 09:47
        Re: Engagement Ring
23.
Feb 10, 13:07Feb 10 13:07
24.
Feb 10, 13:27Feb 10 13:27
       Re: Engagement Ring
26.
Feb 10, 15:52Feb 10 15:52
        Re: Engagement Ring
27.
Feb 10, 16:01Feb 10 16:01
         Re: Engagement Ring
28.
Feb 10, 16:52Feb 10 16:52
          Re: Engagement Ring
30.
Feb 10, 18:55Feb 10 18:55
         Re: Engagement Ring
18.
Feb 10, 10:54Feb 10 10:54
25.
Feb 10, 14:29Feb 10 14:29
29.
Feb 10, 17:47Feb 10 17:47
 31.
Feb 10, 19:08Feb 10 19:08
   Re: Engagement Ring
32.
Feb 10, 19:41Feb 10 19:41
34.
Feb 10, 23:03Feb 10 23:03
2.
Feb 9, 20:06Feb 9 20:06
6.
Feb 9, 22:09Feb 9 22:09
7.
Feb 9, 22:11Feb 9 22:11
12.
Feb 9, 23:10Feb 9 23:10
14.
Feb 10, 05:24Feb 10 05:24
33.
Feb 10, 20:13Feb 10 20:13
35.
Feb 11, 01:34Feb 11 01:34
36.
Feb 11, 08:46Feb 11 08:46
43.
Feb 11, 14:16Feb 11 14:16
44.
Feb 11, 21:14Feb 11 21:14
45.
Feb 12, 13:13Feb 12 13:13
46.
Feb 13, 11:13Feb 13 11:13