I've noticed a few instances where comments have been removed that didn't appear to violate the forum rules but may have simply expressed a different viewpoint or opinion.
I am the Bluesnews arbiter of complete unbiased judgement and fairness. Self-appointed. I have been here for over 20 years and I can say that out of the dozens of times people have complained that their supposedly non-offending posts have been removed and therefore their must be a fundamental bias of certain ideas, I have never seen a single case in which I at least couldn't see their point. The vast majority of the time it is a no-brainer. The idealistic leaning of key people who make the decisions is not what determines it. Ever. What it usually boils down to is the judgement call of the remover and their personal view of what actually crosses a line versus just skirts it. It will be different from yours or mine, but this site doesn't belong to you or me, so that's basically moot.
And no, I have never, ever missed an instance of it happening. Ever. I am quite omnipotent that way.
"The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance, is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."