Acleacius wrote on Mar 26, 2023, 22:41:
Imo, the original allegations seemed real because of the way it was handled in the beginning.
Right but "seemed real" does not equate to "are real". Any corposhill worth their weight in water would look at the company's exposure risk and pick one of two options:
1. Fully cooperate with an investigation if they knew for a fact that they have 100% clean hands. This puts them in the best possible PR and legal light. It means their exposure risk is 0.
2. Evaluate what they know, and more importantly have documented (which will absolutely be compelled), and determine what the risk to their reputation, income, finances, and growth are. If the risk is smaller to fight it out in court, they will always pick that route 100% of the time. It costs them less, overall, in legal fees. They also know that they have the resources, generally, to outlast a single complainant or even a group of complainants if that group is smaller than N in legal proceedings. They also know to cut their risk vector early and swiftly by firing an employee. The employee may not actually be guilty of the accusations but that's not the point. The point is the optics of it. That's part of any basic risk assessment.
I'm not in the "instantly believe all accusations" camp. That, to me, defies basic logic and rigor. I operate under the presumption of innocence until facts prove otherwise. Bandwagoning is a thing, especially in the era of social media and neo-yellow journalism.
As far as I know, there are no lawsuits pending against Avellone's previous employers or Avellone himself at this time. Which means there are no complainants who are willing to actually put their allegations to the court for resolution. So they remain unfounded accusations with no real proof of their merit.
I can accuse you of kicking puppies and sodomizing goats on Twatter. Does that make it true?
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Purveyor of cute, fuzzy, pink bunny slippers.