Flatline wrote on Mar 26, 2023, 18:19:
Acleacius wrote on Mar 26, 2023, 14:04:
Right, it's so ambiguous, the girls could have agreed to pay his legal fees.
Then he paid them the $750k, if they agreed to never speak about it again.
That's not how settlements work. That's not how court works. If you pay the other side's legal fees, you've lost. You can't be making this argument in good faith. They literally 100% retracted what they were saying. If you paid someone to go away they'd never publish a "we 100% didn't mean the words we said" statement. They're admitting guilt in exchange for a settlement and dismissing the charges with prejudice, which means that he can't sue them again for this.
This is a settlement so it's not based on the merits, but let's put it this way, the defendants figured that attorney's fees plus a 7 figure payout is *less* than what they'd pay if this went to court.
The whole point was the statement was ambiguous and anything could be taken from it.
To the retraction, it was clearly written for them and 'they' didn't speak.
Iirc, they never said he assault them but was commenting on him and the allegations against him.
They clearly got caught up in the moment, you know like the fascist news network does, every 10 seconds.
You maybe correct, but once again the idea of how this is being handled public, is too ridiculous to be taken at face value.
But fell free. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Scorpio Slasher: ... What about you boy, what do hate?
Marcus: ... Bullies. Tiny d*ck egotists who hurt people for no reason, make people lock their doors at night. People who make general existence worse, people like you.