Out of the Blue

I tried Blizzard's Queue beta last night for close to an hour. First impressions: The framerate was very steady, and I'm in no danger from harming my mouse or my hand from excessive clicking. But of course things might have been different if I ever got into the game. It seems weird to intentionally limit access to the Diablo IV beta. I would think Blizzard would be eager to take advantage of player interest to actually stress-test the game's ability to withstand a rush of new players when it launches. But I guess that's not a concern, and there will be absolutely no congestion related issues when the game officially launches.

Obituary: Intel co-founder, philanthropist Gordon Moore dies at 94.

Beta Round-up
Thanks Ant and Neutronbeam.

Brunch Link

Stories

Science
Thanks Max.

Media

Creature Features

Follow-up

View : : :
10.
 
Re: OotB: Betaed
Mar 25, 2023, 21:42
10.
Re: OotB: Betaed Mar 25, 2023, 21:42
Mar 25, 2023, 21:42
 
Bill Borre wrote on Mar 25, 2023, 12:37:
Genuine question: Is Moore's Law as dead as he is, or is that too soon?

Yes and at the same time also no. It's complicated.

We think of transistors in terms of silicon because, for a very long time, that has been the majority of their physical makeup (we'll skip MOSFETs for the time being). There have been some germanium transistors as well but they leak worse than silicon so they're not widely used.

The problem is that the more we reduce the size of silicon, the greater the chance of current leakage and field array interference as we pack more and more of them in to smaller and smaller dies.

This is where the "yes...but also no" part comes in. We're reaching, or have reached, the physical limits of what we can do with silicon. However, we have not reached the limits of what we can do with transistors since they're actually really simple devices. To continue "shrinking" die sizes, we need to spend exorbitant sums in material science to devise a viable replacement for silicon that doesn't have the same leakage and interference problems inherent in silicon at smaller yet more dense scale.

So, in summation, we are very near to hitting the wall with silicon but transistors are far from being replaced.

/-=-\

Quantum computing is a lot like cold fusion and low inertia, high thrust drives. We keep hearing about it. We sometimes see lab "examples" but no one is remotely close to putting in to a production ready state that behaves in predictable manner. With current technology, it may very well be improbable to put quantum computing in a predicative, production ready state. That doesn't even include that whole new languages will need to be created, revised, and tested to meet the capabilities of computing at that level and be understood and interfaced with by humanity in a human readable form.

I'm with Tact. I'm not ever going to see it in my lifetime. If I had children, I wouldn't expect to see it in their lifetime, either. We're still using nearly 100 year old technology as "current" technology, today. See above in regards to transistors.
"Just take a look around you, what do you see? Pain, suffering, and misery." -Black Sabbath, Killing Yourself to Live.

“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains” -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Avatar 21247
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
 10.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
 Re: OotB: Betaed
2.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
3.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
5.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
4.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
6.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
7.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
8.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
9.
Mar 25, 2023Mar 25 2023
11.
Mar 26, 2023Mar 26 2023
14.
Mar 27, 2023Mar 27 2023
15.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023
16.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023
17.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023
12.
Mar 27, 2023Mar 27 2023
13.
Mar 27, 2023Mar 27 2023
18.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023
19.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023
20.
Mar 29, 2023Mar 29 2023