Saboth wrote on Nov 29, 2022, 11:22:
Beamer wrote on Nov 29, 2022, 07:25:
Prez wrote on Nov 29, 2022, 02:59:
This site's sudden obsession with Elon Musk is starting to border on unhealthy.
There's never been anything like this in the tech industry. One man buying an entire company and running it largely on mercurial whims he puts out 144 characters at a time while utterly decimating the notion that he's a coherent visionary?
Yeah, I mean...it's big news. 400 million people use Twitter, and it's one of the leading social media companies. Imagine some rich dude buying up GM and immediately laying off half the staff while trolling everyone, then deciding cars don't need steering wheels anymore, then changing his mind and saying he's going to charge $10 a month for a steering wheel or other really really dumb business moves. This from supposedly one of the most prominent "businessmen" and one of the richest people on the planet. It's funny how the Musk fans are suddenly complaining that all of Musk's really bad moves are being reported as he makes them after they have been pushing him and promoting him for years as being this "futurist" that we should all let lead us and we should listen to him. "No, no! Stop looking at Musk! Look away!"
Perhaps Musk thinks of himself as akin to Steve Jobs - who returned to a struggling and downward-spiraling Apple and turned it on a new successful upward trajectory.
Of course, a lot of major differences. Apple sharply refocused on fewer, more profitable products while rolling out products (iPhone and iPad notably) that created entire new categories Apple was able to dominate at the beginning. They also developed the App store and other aspects of Apple's infrastructure system for users to encourage loyalty and a sense of cachet, heavily focused on marketing, and Steve Jobs made use of Tim Cook's superlative logistics talents to not only maximize profitability but also to lock in suppliers from being available to competitors.
Musk has famously been anti-marketing, yet is now running a platform whose profitability heavily requires luring advertisers. And Twitter (nor Musk's other businesses for that matter) lacks as much of a moat as Apple managed to build, and social media seems less likely to create any kind of new category akin to the iPhone rollout unless Meta succeeds in its VR/metaverse/whatever goals at great time and cost, which still gives me weird flashbacks to Google's own massive focus on trying to develop its own social media side for awhile.
It's worth noting that an article today notes that Tesla's share of the U.S. EV market has fallen from 79% to 65% in just 2 years and is forecasted to be less than 20% by 2025.In China, Tesla has a 7% share compared with BYD which has a 28% share and is already just behind Tesla in global share of the market.
But of course, Tesla is worth more than GM, Ford, Toyota, Honda, Mercedes Benz, BMW, and Volkswagen combined - despite selling a fraction of the number of vehicles with a fraction of their combined profits and a fraction of the breadth of vehicles all of those competitors collectively produce. I'm sure there are compelling reasons for Tesla's market cap even now, something to do with "but wait! there's more!". But the implication seems to be that the company can do something along the lines of knock out almost all the other car manufacturers and be pretty much the sole supplier of autos and the sole firm to profit - or else create some kind of incredible new technology that replaces the entire automobile market and the company is again pretty much the sole supplier, etc. Color me pessimistic.
Apple has held its world market share fairly steady - usually around 15-20% - but maintains its profits from regular product upgrades, supply chain profit optimization, its brand value that allows a premium price, and its entire ecosystem that supports and sustains customer loyalty and steady profits. I don't see Tesla developing a similar profitability even if it were to achieve 15% of the worldwide auto market. They're around 2% right now. For comparison purposes, Porsche dominates a niche market with about 1% of total worldwide sales (about half Tesla's share) and makes half the profit. It's difficult to see how Tesla might increase its share while geometrically increasing profits in a worldwide business with many competitors (including notably the Chinese auto makers) for a product that is difficult to eke out profit percentages in the same way Apple can for for a far less expensive product, and a product that people buy far less frequently and in far fewer numbers than they buy phones, and where people like having a huge array of choices. And anyone figuring that self-driving vehicles will somehow be something Tesla can only do and no one else can emulate makes as much sense as the initial fixation on Apple's Siri before Google rolled out their competitor version and Amazon rolled out Alexa.
SpaceX is doing well right now. But there are competitors. And once upon a time Morton Thiokol was at the very top of the rocket-making heap. Now they're just a product part of Northrop Grumman.
All in all - I see more headwinds for Musk in all of his core businesses that would be a challenge for any single CEO, let alone one trying to juggle multiple large companies at once. Of course, Howard Hughes did much the same early in his career, careening from one interest to another with his own mercurial moods...