BigVlad wrote on Nov 26, 2022, 18:52:
You made a fuss about Musk going after pedos on Twitter. That is a truly wacky, Q-level conspiracy take, with no basis in reality. Even if it was happening, it would be an example of suppressing speech, so I would think conservatives would be against booting pedos, but maybe you don't consider yourself a conservative. I have no idea.
The amazing thing about this response is that almost every sentence is literally a self own. Let's take it from the top, shall we?
You made a fuss about Musk going after pedos on Twitter. That is a truly wacky, Q-level conspiracy take, with no basis in reality.
I'm not sure what constitutes "making a fuss," in your mind, but I'm guessing it means "someone voicing an opinion I don't agree with." Guilty
More to the point, I didn't say ANYTHING about Q-Anon. I simply said that Musk was trying to get pedo accounts booted off of twitter. Which he is.
For that you linked me to Q-Anon.
What is Q-Anon, exactly?
I'll let the ADL answer, since I don't actually know much about it.
a baseless conspiracy theory that the world is controlled by the “Deep State,” a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles, and that former President Donald Trump is the only person who can defeat it
How is that connected to my assertion that Musk is trying to boot pedophiles off twitter? If you admit that there ARE pedos on twitter and it seems like you do, then the only thing I said you could object to would be the assertion Musk is trying to kick them off, which you claim is the same as believing that Donald Trump is leading a resistance movement against a global "Deep State" cabal of cannibalistic Satan-worshipping pedophiles. That's a bullshit comparison. And where's the "conspiracy?" Musk bought twitter. If he wants to kick pedophiles off the platform he doesn't need a conspiracy to do so. What conspiracy are you talking about, exactly?
And what is your counter claim here? That Musk wants to keep
twitter? That he is only pretending
to ask twitter users to report all accounts linked to child sexual abuse? And your evidence for this claim would be ... what?
Even if it was happening, it would be an example of suppressing speech, so I would think conservatives would be against booting pedos
So this is kind of disgusting, actually, and breath-taking in the extent to which it reveals your bad faith. You say conservatives are "against booting pedos" because they see banning pedophilia as "suppressing speech."
That's a lie and you know it.
but maybe you don't consider yourself a conservative
Hell no, I don't consider myself a conservative. Or a liberal. All ideologies are blind to their own hypocrisies.
I have no idea.
Now look at that. That's
the one honest thing you wrote.This comment was edited on Nov 27, 2022, 18:46.