Op Ed

  • The Verge - Elden Ring’s character creator fails Black players. Thanks Max.
    "This isn’t just an Elden Ring problem; it’s a video game problem. For many years, players of color have had to mod in things like kinky hairstyles and better, more authentic-looking skin tones in order to have the kind of representation that white players get by default. Games with a customizable protagonist are nearly always represented with a white-passing avatar. And when games do include Black hairstyles, it’s almost always only a fade and an afro, which are the go-to styles whenever a character creator wants to give the appearance of inclusivity while not actually being all that inclusive. (Looking at you, Mass Effect.)"
View : : :
30.
 
Re: Op Ed
Feb 28, 2022, 02:23
30.
Re: Op Ed Feb 28, 2022, 02:23
Feb 28, 2022, 02:23
 
Razumen wrote on Feb 27, 2022, 21:10:

Doesn't matter, like I said, it's made for the Japanese market first.
And It HAS diversity, it's just not diverse enough, and never will be for some people.

Actually it's not made for the Japanese market first. It's first and foremost made for the international market, albeit by Japanese artists and developers. This isn't Square Enix in the late 90s. We're in the 2020s and major game releases are worldwide. This particular lack of diversity is a miss for them, but I don't think it's intentional. Pointing this out will inspire them to do better in the future, which I'm sure they're happy to accommodate. Nothing wrong with that.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
2.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
3.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
7.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
38.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
39.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
   Re: Op Ed
40.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
    Re: Op Ed
41.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
     Re: Op Ed
42.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
   Re: Op Ed
43.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
    Re: Op Ed
44.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
     Re: Op Ed
45.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
      Re: Op Ed
46.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
    Re: Op Ed
47.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
     Re: Op Ed
4.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
5.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
6.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
13.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
14.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
   Re: Op Ed
16.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
    Re: Op Ed
15.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
   removed
8.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
9.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
22.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
23.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
   Re: Op Ed
18.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
36.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
10.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
11.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
12.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
17.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
19.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
20.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
21.
Feb 27, 2022Feb 27 2022
   Re: Op Ed
24.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
   Re: Op Ed
25.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
    Re: Op Ed
26.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
     Re: Op Ed
33.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
      Re: Op Ed
37.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
       Re: Op Ed
52.
Mar 1, 2022Mar 1 2022
        Re: Op Ed
53.
Mar 1, 2022Mar 1 2022
         Re: Op Ed
54.
Mar 1, 2022Mar 1 2022
          Re: Op Ed
27.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
     Re: Op Ed
31.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
      Re: Op Ed
32.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
       Re: Op Ed
 30.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
   Re: Op Ed
28.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
29.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
34.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
35.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
48.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
49.
Feb 28, 2022Feb 28 2022
50.
Mar 1, 2022Mar 1 2022
51.
Mar 1, 2022Mar 1 2022
   Re: Op Ed