Activision Blizzard Lawsuit Complication [Oct 11, 2021, 11:57 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
It was reported
on Friday that the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing was
objecting to a proposed settlement for
a lawsuit filed against Activision Blizzard by the US Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission. This complicates an already complicated situation were
the publisher is fighting two different lawsuits over harassment in the
workplace. But now
PC Gamer has word that this case is more tangled than was previously
suspected, as it involves potential conflicts of interest. Here's
why:
Following this, the EEOC quickly responded with a memorandum of points opposing the DFEH's appeal that contain one pretty legally stunning revelation that leaves the case looking like it's going to become an enormous mess.
The long and short is that the DFEH case has been led by two lawyers that previously worked for the EEOC, and while working for the EEOC they investigated Activision Blizzard in relation to the claims that have led to the settlement. The settlement that they are now objecting to.
If true this would be a conflict of interest, a breach of professional ethics, and a violation of Californian law on the conduct of attorneys. Per the memorandum:
"Specifically, two DFEH attorneys—who play leadership roles within the organization—previously served as EEOC who helped to direct the EEOC's investigation into Commissioner's Charge No. 480-2018-05212 against Activision Blizzard, Inc. These same attorneys then proceeded to represent DFEH in connection with these intervention proceedings, which seek to oppose the consent decree that arose out of the very investigation they helped to direct while at the EEOC."
5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Newer [ 1 ] Older
oh look, more dipshit humans doing dipshit human stuff.
I never want to defend lawyers, but...
From what I heard/read, as part of the settlement agreement for the EEOC lawsuit, Activision Blizzard would delete or legally seal from any employee record anything having to do with the misconduct they are accused of. Since the DFEH lawsuits is still ongoing, the deletions would mean Blizzard would be using the settlement agreement of the EEOC lawsuit in order to destroy evidence related to the ongoing DFEH lawsuit.
IMO, it just looks like the two attorneys that worked at EEOC and DFEH didn't want the EEOC to settle the lawsuit for just $18 million, which is barely pocket change for Activision Blizzard. So, they left and starting a new lawsuit via the DFEH. That said, the lawyers get paid either way, so maybe they are just greedy bastards.
From what I heard/read, as part of the settlement agreement for the EEOC lawsuit, Activision Blizzard would delete or legally seal from any employee record anything having to do with the misconduct they are accused of. Since the DFEH lawsuits is still ongoing, the deletions would mean Blizzard would be using the settlement agreement of the EEOC lawsuit in order to destroy evidence related to the ongoing DFEH lawsuit.
IMO, it just looks like the two attorneys that worked at EEOC and DFEH didn't want the EEOC to settle the lawsuit for just $18 million, which is barely pocket change for Activision Blizzard. So, they left and starting a new lawsuit via the DFEH. That said, the lawyers get paid either way, so maybe they are just greedy bastards.
First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers...;) Henry The Sixth, Part 2 Act 4, scene 2
And no, I do not buy the notion that it's a compliment to lawyers (only lawyers believe that.) Lawyers have been regarded as the bane of society in every country and culture for the last 2,000 years at least. The problem for lawyers is simply this: it makes no sense that it's a compliment, as the phrase strikes a nerve with anyone who has had any real experience with lawyers. If this was praise to lawyers, why, we'd all love the little buggers, wouldn't we?...;) When people use this phrase they aren't complimenting.
This looks exactly like a typical lawyer tactic. I guess they weren't happy with the settlement as their cut of it wasn't that big--so naturally they want more. Doesn't look as if they are going to get it, now that they've been exposed manipulating the system.
And no, I do not buy the notion that it's a compliment to lawyers (only lawyers believe that.) Lawyers have been regarded as the bane of society in every country and culture for the last 2,000 years at least. The problem for lawyers is simply this: it makes no sense that it's a compliment, as the phrase strikes a nerve with anyone who has had any real experience with lawyers. If this was praise to lawyers, why, we'd all love the little buggers, wouldn't we?...;) When people use this phrase they aren't complimenting.
This looks exactly like a typical lawyer tactic. I guess they weren't happy with the settlement as their cut of it wasn't that big--so naturally they want more. Doesn't look as if they are going to get it, now that they've been exposed manipulating the system.
It is well known that I cannot err--and so, if you should happen across an error in anything I have written you can be absolutely sure that *I* did not write it!...;)
Greedy bastards trying to double dip, eh?
An alphabet soup actual clusterfuck involving the slimiest specimens known to man … lawyers.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 20 July 2025, 00:00.