12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
12.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
12.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
 
There were no words, "homosexual" or otherwise, on the cake.

He refused to do anything for a gay couple. Buying off the shelf wouldn't be for a gay couple, just purchased by one, but something custom would be for them.

Such hollow, fragile beliefs. Can't recall Jesus not helping someone because they were gay.

Also, wtf makes words homosexual?
11.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
NKD
11.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
NKD
 
SabreT wrote on Sep 11, 2021, 23:50:
They only refused to write the homosexual words on the cake.

What are the "homosexual words" that they wanted on the cake? The article you linked makes no mention of this.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Avatar 43041
10.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
10.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
 
Jonjonz wrote on Sep 11, 2021, 07:38:
Texas, these are the same nitwits that think it's ok for a bakery to refuse to bake a wedding cake for homosexuals.

They only refused to write the homosexual words on the cake. The even offered another cake but the clients refused it. But that doesn't make good headlines. Your welcome to look it up if you can find a non propaganda version of it.

Edit : Found an non bias article about it from the court case.
https://tinyurl.com/w2kahh2r
"He was willing for his bakery to sell an already prepared cake for the couple, but not to make one for them."

This comment was edited on Sep 12, 2021, 00:03.
9.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
9.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
 
Texas, these are the same nitwits that think it's ok for a bakery to refuse to bake a wedding cake for homosexuals.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride! - HT
Avatar 57379
8.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
8.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
 
Lower Case https://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/board.pl?action=userinfo&user=16366
“We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces." Carl Sagan
Avatar 58135
7.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
7.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:51:
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:47:
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.

SpaceCaptain on steroids

SC returned recently by another name, and so far has been a productive member of this community.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
6.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
NKD
6.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
NKD
 
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:47:
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.

SpaceCaptain on steroids
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Avatar 43041
5.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
5.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
 
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.
“We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces." Carl Sagan
Avatar 58135
4.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
Quboid
 
4.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
 Quboid
 
Beamer wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 14:00:
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.

Sadly, many conservatives appear to define those things as core conservatism.
Not outright, but they defend any person banned for those reasons, plus harassment, as being "banned for being conservative."

Yet they complain when other people point out their racism, their sexism, and so on. They define it as part of their ideology yet they complain when it's pointed out.
Avatar 10439
3.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
3.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.

Sadly, many conservatives appear to define those things as core conservatism.
Not outright, but they defend any person banned for those reasons, plus harassment, as being "banned for being conservative."
2.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
2.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
That Texas law will probably get shut down on 1st Amendment grounds, but who knows. It doesn't really matter much because no one gets banned from Twitter for promoting small government or Randroid propaganda, or other similar conservative viewpoints. You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.
DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN WOMENS HEALTH, VOTING RIGHTS, RELIABLE GRID. gosh
“We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces." Carl Sagan
Avatar 58135
1.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
NKD
1.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
NKD
 
That Texas law will probably get shut down on 1st Amendment grounds, but who knows. It doesn't really matter much because no one gets banned from Twitter for promoting small government or Randroid propaganda, or other similar conservative viewpoints. You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Avatar 43041
12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older