12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
12.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
12.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
Sep 12, 2021, 09:02
 
There were no words, "homosexual" or otherwise, on the cake.

He refused to do anything for a gay couple. Buying off the shelf wouldn't be for a gay couple, just purchased by one, but something custom would be for them.

Such hollow, fragile beliefs. Can't recall Jesus not helping someone because they were gay.

Also, wtf makes words homosexual?
11.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
11.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
Sep 12, 2021, 03:21
 
SabreT wrote on Sep 11, 2021, 23:50:
They only refused to write the homosexual words on the cake.

What are the "homosexual words" that they wanted on the cake? The article you linked makes no mention of this.
This is Bob Barker reminding you to help control the Canadian bartender population — have your Canadian bartenders spayed or neutered.
Avatar 43041
10.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
10.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
Sep 11, 2021, 23:50
 
Jonjonz wrote on Sep 11, 2021, 07:38:
Texas, these are the same nitwits that think it's ok for a bakery to refuse to bake a wedding cake for homosexuals.

They only refused to write the homosexual words on the cake. The even offered another cake but the clients refused it. But that doesn't make good headlines. Your welcome to look it up if you can find a non propaganda version of it.

Edit : Found an non bias article about it from the court case.
https://tinyurl.com/w2kahh2r
"He was willing for his bakery to sell an already prepared cake for the couple, but not to make one for them."

This comment was edited on Sep 12, 2021, 00:03.
9.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
9.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
Sep 11, 2021, 07:38
 
Texas, these are the same nitwits that think it's ok for a bakery to refuse to bake a wedding cake for homosexuals.
"Meet the new Boss, same as the old Boss." - The Who.
Avatar 57379
8.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
8.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
Sep 11, 2021, 02:20
 
Lower Case https://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/board.pl?action=userinfo&user=16366
- At this point, Windows is the OS equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome. -
Burrito of Peace
Avatar 58135
7.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
7.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
Sep 11, 2021, 01:43
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:51:
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:47:
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.

SpaceCaptain on steroids

SC returned recently by another name, and so far has been a productive member of this community.
I'm a smoldering volcano of virility. At least, that's what I tell myself.
Avatar 22024
6.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
6.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
Sep 10, 2021, 23:51
 
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 23:47:
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.

SpaceCaptain on steroids
This is Bob Barker reminding you to help control the Canadian bartender population — have your Canadian bartenders spayed or neutered.
Avatar 43041
5.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
5.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
Sep 10, 2021, 23:47
 
Bans don't work for some reason?

Snippet
In the lawsuit, Twitch insists it took "swift action" against the defendants by suspending and eventually permanently banning their accounts. However, both continually evaded bans by creating new, alternate Twitch accounts "and continually altering their self-described 'hate raid code' to avoid detection and suspension". If they are not stopped, says Twitch, "they will continued to harass and disrupt" the community.
- At this point, Windows is the OS equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome. -
Burrito of Peace
Avatar 58135
4.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
Quboid
 
4.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
Sep 10, 2021, 19:03
 Quboid
 
Beamer wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 14:00:
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.

Sadly, many conservatives appear to define those things as core conservatism.
Not outright, but they defend any person banned for those reasons, plus harassment, as being "banned for being conservative."

Yet they complain when other people point out their racism, their sexism, and so on. They define it as part of their ideology yet they complain when it's pointed out.
Avatar 10439
3.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
3.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
Sep 10, 2021, 14:00
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.

Sadly, many conservatives appear to define those things as core conservatism.
Not outright, but they defend any person banned for those reasons, plus harassment, as being "banned for being conservative."
2.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
2.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
Sep 10, 2021, 13:45
 
NKD wrote on Sep 10, 2021, 12:59:
That Texas law will probably get shut down on 1st Amendment grounds, but who knows. It doesn't really matter much because no one gets banned from Twitter for promoting small government or Randroid propaganda, or other similar conservative viewpoints. You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.
DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN WOMENS HEALTH, VOTING RIGHTS, RELIABLE GRID. gosh
- At this point, Windows is the OS equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome. -
Burrito of Peace
Avatar 58135
1.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
1.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
Sep 10, 2021, 12:59
 
That Texas law will probably get shut down on 1st Amendment grounds, but who knows. It doesn't really matter much because no one gets banned from Twitter for promoting small government or Randroid propaganda, or other similar conservative viewpoints. You have to try pretty hard to get banned, like out and out racism or incitement to violence.
This is Bob Barker reminding you to help control the Canadian bartender population — have your Canadian bartenders spayed or neutered.
Avatar 43041
12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older