10.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Apr 6, 2021, 18:47
10.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Apr 6, 2021, 18:47
Apr 6, 2021, 18:47
 
jdreyer wrote on Apr 6, 2021, 18:20:
Sepharo wrote on Apr 6, 2021, 17:56:
WaltC wrote on Apr 6, 2021, 17:08:
Section 230 only provides safe-harbor for sites if they refuse to edit/delete posts from the public without a valid reason, (ie, egregious profanity or threats of violence against named individuals, are valid reasons for deletion.) When FB and Twitter delete and tag posts with prejudicial descriptions--it's the most extreme kind of editing there is. Disagreeing with the opinion expressed is not a valid reason to delete a post on a 230 site. Both of these sites can be sued for violating 230--which is what any honest government would do--but so far no government entity has stepped up to enforce 230's safe-harbor restrictions on these two web sites--the Trump administration, included. They should be fined $100k a day for every post they delete & tag with supercilious warnings, imo--and eventually they'd get the message, I feel sure...;) Today, we have an unusually timid government in Washington when it comes to enforcing our laws. Never seen it this bad.

This is not at all true and you should reevaluate the source you're getting this information from.
I wonder if he ever returns and reads these replies.

He's returned, but rarely.
He mostly just spews easily disproven information and acts as if he's the smart one for being wilfully misled.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 6, 12:50Apr 6 12:50
2.
Apr 6, 13:23Apr 6 13:23
3.
Apr 6, 14:45Apr 6 14:45
4.
Apr 6, 15:20Apr 6 15:20
5.
Apr 6, 17:08Apr 6 17:08
7.
Apr 6, 17:42Apr 6 17:42
11.
Apr 7, 01:49Apr 7 01:49
12.
Apr 7, 02:32Apr 7 02:32
13.
Apr 7, 03:02Apr 7 03:02
8.
Apr 6, 17:56Apr 6 17:56
9.
Apr 6, 18:20Apr 6 18:20
 10.
Apr 6, 18:47Apr 6 18:47
   Re: Morning Legal Briefs
6.
Apr 6, 17:13Apr 6 17:13
14.
Apr 7, 06:55Apr 7 06:55