I'm not going to deny it, Biden has goofed and executed foot in mouth plenty. But you don't want to compare that to some of the things Trump says. Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:42:
Detached from reality? Have you seen Biden lately??
During his campaign, Biden often asked voters to support the "Harris-Biden" ticket.
Just recently, he said,
"I took it to instill public confidence in the vaccine. President-elect Harris took hers today for the same reason,"

Because Joe is known for his precise speaking ability.

Joe Biden's best teleprompter gaffes of 2020

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:42:
Detached from reality? Have you seen Biden lately??
During his campaign, Biden often asked voters to support the "Harris-Biden" ticket.
Just recently, he said,
"I took it to instill public confidence in the vaccine. President-elect Harris took hers today for the same reason,"

You know, even if what you're saying is actually proof of anything, it's not a real big deal. I can guarantee you of the 80 million votes for Biden, a vast majority of them didn't vote for him, they voted against Trump. If the day comes during his term where Biden is no longer President, it still will be a far better situation than having Trump for another 4 years concreting his groundwork to never leave office.

Wolfen wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:28:
Here is the whole video for reference on that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls

You can take what you want from it. I don't see a comparison personally between her comments and Trumps though. Also I don't believe ALL the Trump supporters there really approved of what was happening at the capitol. I also think ANY person under any movement who causes violence or destruction should be dealt with equally and fairly under our justice system. Protesting is one thing. Violence is another.

Apparently 45% of Republicans approved of the storming of the Capitol.

Supposedly? His campaign sent emails to the insurrectionists to be there at a certain date. He fired them up and said they needed to march on the capitol to show their "strength".

This was not a riot or protests. This was a violent insurrection against our government. A riot is random violence against random targets such as parked cars, storefronts, etc. with no goal. This was storming the capitol in hopes the lawmakers would be there. While some of the perps looked and acted like clowns, there were some armed with restraints, weapons. For in inexplicable reason, security was abnormally light this day that Trump and dark-money organizations (through robocalls) told these people to be there. As the coup progressed, Trump refused to call in reinforcements such as the National Guard, and his aides state he seemed elated by what was happening. They begged him to release a statement to condemn and diffuse the situation. He refused. Instead, he actually had the gall to call up congressional lawmakers and tell them now is the time to throw the election to him, while they were under duress. Hours later a prerecorded statement was released which again called the election fraudulent and rigged, which were the very things that caused these people to march in the first place. He also expressed his admiration for those who participated in the insurrection.

During the events, there were obviously some people participating that knew exactly where certain sensitive areas were, even if legislators worked in areas that were not their public offices. Laptops, files, and desktops of top-level government officials were stolen or accessed during the coup. Whether it was Trump supporters or foreign agents using the chaos of the Trump Insurrection as cover, we do not know at this time.

Trump deserves to be impeached and charged for his role in instigating this violent insurrection, as do the others who participated. Trump supporters should be ashamed for continued support of this treasonous clown.

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:03:
Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.
Trump only has a few days left in office, and this sets a precedent that could come back to bite them very soon.

Soon-to-be President Harris (we all know Joe won't last long) praised those peaceful protests over the summer as the "New Coalition of Conscience" and even helped raise money to bail them out.

In August, Senator Kamala Harris spoke to former comedian Stephen Colbert about the riots that rocked the country throughout the summer. Harris gleefully said that "they're not gonna stop," come the election. "This is a movement, I'm telling you," she said.
Colbert noted that media just wasn't covering these riots by the end of August for some reason, and Harris seemed to think this was a problem.
Harris nodded, "Right, that's right," she said. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. This is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop. And everyone BEWARE, because they're not gonna stop."
"They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. And that should be–everyone should take note of that, on both levels.
They're not gonna let up," Harris said with pride, "and they should not. And we should not."
The August 30 interview came after 30 people were killed in the intensive rioting from May through August, and billions of dollars in property damage was reported.

https://channel411news.com/2021/01/07/flashback-kamala-harris-celebrated-blm-and-antifa-riots/

Detached from reality? Have you seen Biden lately??
During his campaign, Biden often asked voters to support the "Harris-Biden" ticket.
Just recently, he said,
"I took it to instill public confidence in the vaccine. President-elect Harris took hers today for the same reason,"

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:03:
Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.

Apparently, unfortunately, someone at the ACLU agrees with you. Frankly, I think it is a bunch of baloney. It isn't like Twitter is a news source. It is a chat application. The only thing unreasonable about Twitter suspending Trump's account, is that it took this long.

Beamer wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:14:

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:03:
Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.
Trump only has a few days left in office, and this sets a precedent that could come back to bite them very soon.

Soon-to-be President Harris (we all know Joe won't last long) praised those peaceful protests over the summer as the "New Coalition of Conscience" and even helped raise money to bail them out.

In August, Senator Kamala Harris spoke to former comedian Stephen Colbert about the riots that rocked the country throughout the summer. Harris gleefully said that "they're not gonna stop," come the election. "This is a movement, I'm telling you," she said.
Colbert noted that media just wasn't covering these riots by the end of August for some reason, and Harris seemed to think this was a problem.
Harris nodded, "Right, that's right," she said. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. This is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop. And everyone BEWARE, because they're not gonna stop."
"They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. And that should be–everyone should take note of that, on both levels.
They're not gonna let up," Harris said with pride, "and they should not. And we should not."
The August 30 interview came after 30 people were killed in the intensive rioting from May through August, and billions of dollars in property damage was reported.

https://channel411news.com/2021/01/07/flashback-kamala-harris-celebrated-blm-and-antifa-riots/

You do understand you come across as detached from reality. I'm sure you feel you're the only one "awake," and we're "sheeple," but the whole Harris comment is dramatically unhealthy.

Stop getting your news from wherever you're getting it (I'm wagering a lot of Ben Shapiro and YouTube channels with under 100,000 subscribers.)

Here is the whole video for reference on that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls

You can take what you want from it. I don't see a comparison personally between her comments and Trumps though. Also I don't believe ALL the Trump supporters there really approved of what was happening at the capitol. I also think ANY person under any movement who causes violence or destruction should be dealt with equally and fairly under our justice system. Protesting is one thing. Violence is another.

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:03:
Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.
Trump only has a few days left in office, and this sets a precedent that could come back to bite them very soon.

Soon-to-be President Harris (we all know Joe won't last long) praised those peaceful protests over the summer as the "New Coalition of Conscience" and even helped raise money to bail them out.

In August, Senator Kamala Harris spoke to former comedian Stephen Colbert about the riots that rocked the country throughout the summer. Harris gleefully said that "they're not gonna stop," come the election. "This is a movement, I'm telling you," she said.
Colbert noted that media just wasn't covering these riots by the end of August for some reason, and Harris seemed to think this was a problem.
Harris nodded, "Right, that's right," she said. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. This is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop. And everyone BEWARE, because they're not gonna stop."
"They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. And that should be–everyone should take note of that, on both levels.
They're not gonna let up," Harris said with pride, "and they should not. And we should not."
The August 30 interview came after 30 people were killed in the intensive rioting from May through August, and billions of dollars in property damage was reported.

https://channel411news.com/2021/01/07/flashback-kamala-harris-celebrated-blm-and-antifa-riots/

You're right, it does set a precedent, don't use the Office of the President of the United States to incite insurrection against the lawfully elected government in an attempt to overturn the lawfully accepted results of the election. Just because Trump only has "a few days" left in office means little, the fact that he openly did this without reservation should make people far more worried than private entities exercising their right to refusal of service to those that violate their terms of service.

Also, if you're one of those trying to compare the protesting borne from unjust murders to that of a President inciting a mob because he lost an election, then, well...there's little that can be intellectually discussed with you. Not one person, Democrat, Republican, Independent, whatever...ever condoned the violence that took place, what they condoned was the peaceful 'disobedience' in the name of progress. Of the protests, some 6% of them became exceedingly violent after, investigations found, they were instigated by agitators not affiliated with anyone involved with the protests. And really, if you're going to complain about people looting a business to that of storming one of the official seats of American Democracy with the intent of halting democratic process, then you are even worse off than I thought.

Compare this with the rally prior to the "March" to the Capitol...a sitting President hammering home unfounded claims, outright proven lies, and inflammatory rhetoric to an already incited mob cannot be seen as anything other than seditious.

JediPunisher wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 19:03:
Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.
Trump only has a few days left in office, and this sets a precedent that could come back to bite them very soon.

Soon-to-be President Harris (we all know Joe won't last long) praised those peaceful protests over the summer as the "New Coalition of Conscience" and even helped raise money to bail them out.

In August, Senator Kamala Harris spoke to former comedian Stephen Colbert about the riots that rocked the country throughout the summer. Harris gleefully said that "they're not gonna stop," come the election. "This is a movement, I'm telling you," she said.
Colbert noted that media just wasn't covering these riots by the end of August for some reason, and Harris seemed to think this was a problem.
Harris nodded, "Right, that's right," she said. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. This is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop. And everyone BEWARE, because they're not gonna stop."
"They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. And that should be–everyone should take note of that, on both levels.
They're not gonna let up," Harris said with pride, "and they should not. And we should not."
The August 30 interview came after 30 people were killed in the intensive rioting from May through August, and billions of dollars in property damage was reported.

https://channel411news.com/2021/01/07/flashback-kamala-harris-celebrated-blm-and-antifa-riots/

You do understand you come across as detached from reality. I'm sure you feel you're the only one "awake," and we're "sheeple," but the whole Harris comment is dramatically unhealthy.

Stop getting your news from wherever you're getting it (I'm wagering a lot of Ben Shapiro and YouTube channels with under 100,000 subscribers.)

Banning the current President of the United States from social media for supposedly inciting an angry mob is a bad idea.
Trump only has a few days left in office, and this sets a precedent that could come back to bite them very soon.

Soon-to-be President Harris (we all know Joe won't last long) praised those peaceful protests over the summer as the "New Coalition of Conscience" and even helped raise money to bail them out.

In August, Senator Kamala Harris spoke to former comedian Stephen Colbert about the riots that rocked the country throughout the summer. Harris gleefully said that "they're not gonna stop," come the election. "This is a movement, I'm telling you," she said.
Colbert noted that media just wasn't covering these riots by the end of August for some reason, and Harris seemed to think this was a problem.
Harris nodded, "Right, that's right," she said. "But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. This is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop. And everyone BEWARE, because they're not gonna stop."
"They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. And that should be–everyone should take note of that, on both levels.
They're not gonna let up," Harris said with pride, "and they should not. And we should not."
The August 30 interview came after 30 people were killed in the intensive rioting from May through August, and billions of dollars in property damage was reported.

https://channel411news.com/2021/01/07/flashback-kamala-harris-celebrated-blm-and-antifa-riots/

Child sexual abuse imagery is absolutely rampant.

NYT: Child Sex Abuse offers some insight, I listened to a podcast based from the same journalism. Unique and specific key words can be typed into google or bing right now, and will instantly bring up images. It is easy to imagine Reddit being used to facilitate the exchange of such words, codes, naming schemes, and occasionally images by brazen pedos.

The story in the podcast had an interview with a mother who divorced after she discovered her husband to be uploading pictures of their daughter. Part of the tracking by the government organizations include notifying the parents when the report media pops up again. But once the girl turns a certain age (I think it was 18), she will automatically receive those notifications. Problem for the mother is: her daughter doesn't know because she was so young, and the mother has protected her since.

Rectal Prolapse wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 17:37:

RedEye9 wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 16:35:
Since one of the forums recent updates you can no longer post the word sigh by itself.

*sigh*

brilliant

Trump gets banned from Twitter just before he was about to release his health care plan and his taxes.

* REMOVED *

This comment was deleted on Jan 9, 2021, 22:48. Reason: The violent part of your comment is over the top.

RedEye9 wrote on Jan 9, 2021, 16:35:
Since one of the forums recent updates you can no longer post the word sigh by itself.

*sigh*

Since one of the forums recent updates you can no longer post the word sigh by itself.

I'm pretty sure he means the overly dramatic generalization of this woman? I've never seen child porn on Reddit, it's hard to believe it's there.
There are scammers and this woman could be one. It could be why the Swedish authorities ignore her, because she's a lair and a fraud?
Reddit has a huge number of moderators, not to mention AI Bots that constantly remove posts because of words and pictures.
How could this woman know there's child porn. Does this woman know the legal age of girls in every country.

Seriously though, even if there is child porn on Reddit the idea some rando woman on the internet needs to tell authorities is ridiculous.
There are very serious International Policing units that work together across borders to bust rings. The real abuse rings seem to come
from investigations of authorities on the dark web, which Reddit is not. Also, the real problem sex trafficking, afaik.

As far as these girls who do this from the protection of their own homes. I can't imagine how rich some of these girls are who do those cams.
It's seems like strip clubs on the internet with full protection for the girls. I.e. they don't need bouncers from clubs to protect them.
They don't have to be near these nutjob males who just kill women from not talking to them, like incels. And isn't prostitution legal in Sweden
(maybe I'm thinking of Denmark?, sorry). Them having the protection of the government keeps them from being abused and used by pimps.

[Sorry to sound like a conspiracy theorists but my guess is this is some religious scam to control women.
It's an easy problem to solve, if you don't want girls doing this provide them (and boys) free education, teach them self defense,
and teach boys to respect women as equals. Religions want to control and subjugate women, not treat them as equals.
I can't recall exactly but didn't 3 of the current major religions (Latin, Muslim and Hebrew) treat women as inferior to men, in biblical times. ]

Bloody Hands doctrine, don't intentionally create a problem, then complain when about the results.

Are you upset that someone is actively searching for child porn on the internet to expose it, report it and get it removed and prosecuted.

Seems a bit odd for something to rant about don't you think.

"I have called the Swedish authorities five times in the last couple of months, because I've seen child porn on Reddit," said Ms Vega.

Dafuq? I've accidentally stumbled ONCE on a child porn site more than a decade ago. And I have NEVER encountered it on any of the big platforms. And it's not like I never used keywords like "young" in searches.

She has to be looking for it on purpose all fucking day long.

Bloody religious fanatics/nutters.