Linthat22 wrote on Jan 20, 2021, 15:25:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 16:23:Beamer wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:25:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:10:Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
You just wait and see. I'm not the only one saying this, but if this is a shock to the system, go ahead and screencap this.![]()
You're in good company with Trump, his family, Rudy Giuliani, OAN, Jacob Wohl, and literally no one else.
Don't screencap this, just make a gentleman's bet. If Trump gets 4 more years, I'll never post here again. If he isn't President next year, you agree to the same.
Deal and bookmarked. I'll even ask Blue to cancel my account.
*edit* I don't want you to stop posting, this is all in fun.
Blue, go ahead and cancel my account (to prevent me from posting here). True to my word.
Linthat22 wrote on Jun 4, 2020, 12:53:Here's how he dominated: Lost the Senate
Trump is going to dominate during his second run. Thank God!
with the most congressman ever to cross party lines and vote for the Articles of Impeachment
Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 16:23:Beamer wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:25:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:10:Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
You just wait and see. I'm not the only one saying this, but if this is a shock to the system, go ahead and screencap this.![]()
You're in good company with Trump, his family, Rudy Giuliani, OAN, Jacob Wohl, and literally no one else.
Don't screencap this, just make a gentleman's bet. If Trump gets 4 more years, I'll never post here again. If he isn't President next year, you agree to the same.
Deal and bookmarked. I'll even ask Blue to cancel my account.
*edit* I don't want you to stop posting, this is all in fun.
Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 16:23:Beamer wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:25:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:10:Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
You just wait and see. I'm not the only one saying this, but if this is a shock to the system, go ahead and screencap this.![]()
You're in good company with Trump, his family, Rudy Giuliani, OAN, Jacob Wohl, and literally no one else.
Don't screencap this, just make a gentleman's bet. If Trump gets 4 more years, I'll never post here again. If he isn't President next year, you agree to the same.
Deal and bookmarked. I'll even ask Blue to cancel my account.
*edit* I don't want you to stop posting, this is all in fun.
Beamer wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:25:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:10:Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
You just wait and see. I'm not the only one saying this, but if this is a shock to the system, go ahead and screencap this.![]()
You're in good company with Trump, his family, Rudy Giuliani, OAN, Jacob Wohl, and literally no one else.
Don't screencap this, just make a gentleman's bet. If Trump gets 4 more years, I'll never post here again. If he isn't President next year, you agree to the same.
Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 14:10:Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
You just wait and see. I'm not the only one saying this, but if this is a shock to the system, go ahead and screencap this.![]()
Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:33:Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 09:20:Thanks for that link.
Something should probably be done about socially irresponsible media, and I don't currently have an answer as to what that could/should be, but dropping Section 230 definitely isn't it. That would dramatically alter a large part of the internet as we know it, and not for the better. It's basically the online version of the US First Amendment (an over-simplification). Without it, many sites, especially smaller ones like Blues, would most likely have to prevent any kind of user forum or comments for fear of violating the Communications Decency Act and getting into a lot of expensive trouble. But that would also include user generated/uploaded media as well (images/video/etc).
Here's more info that explains it better than I could.
Nullity wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 09:20:Jonjonz wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 06:39:Something should probably be done about socially irresponsible media, and I don't currently have an answer as to what that could/should be, but dropping Section 230 definitely isn't it. That would dramatically alter a large part of the internet as we know it, and not for the better. It's basically the online version of the US First Amendment (an over-simplification). Without it, many sites, especially smaller ones like Blues, would most likely have to prevent any kind of user forum or comments for fear of violating the Communications Decency Act and getting into a lot of expensive trouble. But that would also include user generated/uploaded media as well (images/video/etc).
230 needs to go to prevent socially irresponsible media (Farcebook, Twatter, etc.) from promoting the kind of false information that got this clown elected in the first place.
Here's more info that explains it better than I could.
Linthat22 wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 11:14:HAHAHA, what reality do you think you're in?
The salt mine here never fails. I hope you guys are ready for four more years.
Jonjonz wrote on Nov 18, 2020, 06:39:Something should probably be done about socially irresponsible media, and I don't currently have an answer as to what that could/should be, but dropping Section 230 definitely isn't it. That would dramatically alter a large part of the internet as we know it, and not for the better. It's basically the online version of the US First Amendment (an over-simplification). Without it, many sites, especially smaller ones like Blues, would most likely have to prevent any kind of user forum or comments for fear of violating the Communications Decency Act and getting into a lot of expensive trouble. But that would also include user generated/uploaded media as well (images/video/etc).
230 needs to go to prevent socially irresponsible media (Farcebook, Twatter, etc.) from promoting the kind of false information that got this clown elected in the first place.
TriggleDiggle wrote on Nov 17, 2020, 23:25:"pretty crazy if its true"? Krebs isn't even the first person Loser-President has fired via tweet.
They forgot to link to where Trump "Fired him in a tweet". Which is pretty crazy if its true.