Morning Legal Briefs [Sep 30, 2020, 11:42 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Newer [ 1 ] Older
I think it's bullshit. Unless you're saying 'Ahhh just gimme whatever.' you're directing the tattooist what to do, style, color, etc. All they're doing is realizing your vision. It should go without saying that a tattoo belongs entirely to the person it's on.
"Van Gogh painted alone and in despair and in madness and sold one picture in his entire life. Millions struggled alone, unrecognized, and struggled as heroically as any famous hero. Was it worthless? I knew it wasn't."
Great, and with an opposing ruling already on file, I can already see this ending up at SCOTUS... On the bright side, if it does at least it won't really have an impact on 99.9% of the populace... 
“Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” -- Carl Sagan
This is unsettling. Because it now sets a precedent and can open the possibility of artists suing you for just having “their” work in a photo or video. I also do not recall signing a disclosure that I had no legal rights to the artwork I had put into my skin. Even the designs I didn’t create myself.
Will we see game companies go after tattoos of game characters.
Oh shit.... I can see the trolls buying up the rights to abandonware games now.
Will we see game companies go after tattoos of game characters.
Oh shit.... I can see the trolls buying up the rights to abandonware games now.
3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Newer [ 1 ] Older
Copyright © 1996-2024 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2024 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 11 September 2024, 23:29.