Dev wrote on Aug 6, 2020, 16:53:
jdreyer wrote on Aug 6, 2020, 16:11:That would be my argument, missing the redundant part.
RedEye9 wrote on Aug 6, 2020, 16:03:I suppose it could be argued that it's missing the "redundant" part of RAID.
Dev wrote on Aug 6, 2020, 15:44:Raid Zero is definitely still a raid.
Raid 0 isn't raid, just doubles your chance of catastrophic data loss.
Also, Linus is so young in that vid. SO YOUNG.
I understand the definitions, I'm not saying it's non raid out of ignorance. I'm saying it based data redundancy, and how many people don't realize they just doubled their chance of catastrophic data loss in case of hardware failure if they use RAID 0.
On the other hand, it's named "Raid 0" as in "Zero RAID" or "Zero Redundancy." Perhaps that's why they started with "0" instead of "1?"
RAID 0 is definitely trading performance for stability.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!