Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - RSS Headlines   RSS Headlines   Twitter   Twitter

CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek

Eurogamer reports on a new court document (which inspires a warning from Google, so use caution) filed by Cloud Imperium Games in response to Crytek's recent motion to dismiss their own lawsuit (thanks Korrd). The suit concerns whether CIG properly licensed the CryENGINE for Star Citizen and Squadron 42, their upcoming space games. Crytek asked the suit be dismissed without prejudice so it can be reopened in the future. Cloud Imperium is seeking a dismissal with prejudice, which would end the case for good and force Crytek to compensate them for some of their legal costs. Here's some of Eurogamer's summary of the new filing:
Following Crytek's motion to dismiss its own lawsuit, CIG has had its say, and in a strongly-worded court document moved to discredit Crytek's lawsuit. It described it as "meritless in light of CIG's separate licence with Amazon", and insisted GLA expressly grants CIG the right to use CryEngine and to develop Squadron 42.

CIG said in May 2019, Crytek "sheepishly and belatedly" emailed Amazon to ask if it had truly granted CIG a licence covering prior versions of CryEngine as well as Lumberyard. According to CIG, in that email, "Crytek conceded that an affirmative answer would likely tank its Squadron 42 claim." Amazon confirmed it licensed Lumberyard to CIG in 2016 - and that it included CryEngine in that licence.

"CIG's separate licence with Amazon operates as a complete defense against Crytek's remaining claims so they too never should have been brought," CIG says.

"Instead of acting responsibly even at that late moment, Crytek persisted, fought the bond motion, and dithered another seven months before bringing this motion."
View

6. Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Jan 19, 2020, 14:16 Cutter
 
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Jan 19, 2020, 13:06:
Now we have confirmation from Amazon that not only did it licence Lumberyard to CIG (which was publicly known) but also CryEngine, meaning that CIG cannot be in breach of the GLA with Crytek. Not that Crytek's claim had any merit, as the GLA specifically included Star Citizen AND Squadron 42.

Crytek attempted to extort CIG and now it looks like it will be on the hook for over $500,000 in legal costs, possibly a lot more. Crytek should be focused on paying its own employees rather than filing baseless lawsuits that will create even more of a blackhole in its finances.

Are you privy to the original contract between Crytek and CIG? If not than how would you possibly know? All I've seen is the usual convoluted mess of their PR people engaging in he said/she said.

 
Avatar 25394
 



"Don't get drawn into the culture, Morty. Stealing stuff is about the stuff, not the stealing."
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jan 19, 13:06 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek theyarecomingforyou
  2. Jan 19, 13:10  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek RedEye9
  3. Jan 19, 13:12   Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek theyarecomingforyou
>> 6. Jan 19, 14:16  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Cutter
  7. Jan 19, 16:27   Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek jdreyer
  8. Jan 19, 16:53    Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Cutter
  10. Jan 19, 17:16     Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Choobeastia
  12. Jan 19, 18:27      Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Cutter
  14. Jan 20, 04:01       Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek theyarecomingforyou
  17. Jan 20, 12:08  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Kxmode
  25. Jan 20, 18:09   Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek theyarecomingforyou
  26. Jan 20, 18:14    Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek RedEye9
  27. Jan 20, 23:13     Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Drayth
  28. Jan 22, 02:40     Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Kxmode
  4. Jan 19, 13:31 removed Sahiphopza
  5. Jan 19, 13:36  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Armengar
  9. Jan 19, 17:15 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Kxmode
  11. Jan 19, 18:19 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek WaltC
  13. Jan 19, 19:40 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek clint
  15. Jan 20, 09:22 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Citizen P
  16. Jan 20, 09:51 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek The Pyro
  18. Jan 20, 12:16  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Korrd
  19. Jan 20, 12:22 Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Primalchrome
  20. Jan 20, 12:29  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Mr. Tact
  21. Jan 20, 12:43    Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Kxmode
  22. Jan 20, 13:19   Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek RedEye9
  23. Jan 20, 14:11  Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek Dev
  24. Jan 20, 15:56   Re: CIG's Star Citizen Rebuttal to Crytek clint