Drayth wrote on Oct 23, 2019, 10:53:
I didn't want to have to go digging up shit I saw years ago, but I found this which seems to cover what I remember hearing back then (with screenshots).
You seem to just omit anyone from any potential wrong doing automatically if they're female. When there's this many scandals surrounding a single person, maybe there's something to it? I still acknowledge I can't say for 100% any of this is absolutely accurate (just like I can say the same for ANYTHING I read (maybe Trump's a nice guy?)), but there's just so much evidence. So is half the internet in on this? Meanwhile you JUMP down anyone's throat as if the source of any of her criticism is coming from like 2 angry dudes on the internet.
There's her kickstarter which raised 80 + million for a video game she's no longer bothering to make. And seems to be out of money now, even though during the kickstarter she was caught staying at a very expensive Japanese hotel. Was that all made up? A whole cabal of angry men got together and worked out the fake news to spread everywhere on it?
Women have just as much potential to be a complete asshole as anyone else. So when I read so-and-so has been caught doing whatever I just judge it based on how much evidence there is. Gender isn't part of that unless it specifically is. Like when someone does do wrong doing to someone because they're female, or gay or w/e. That shit's deplorable. I just don't get the impression this one's suffering directly from much if any of that.
You just posted from Return of Kings, the defunct site run by RooshV, a guy who wrote a book that literally advocates never listening when a girl says "no" because that's all "part of flirting and having sex."
Beyond that, you just went to a whole rant that even includes Trump, claiming I omit anyone from wrongdoing because they have a vagina, when you made a specific claim and cannot back it up.
If you don't want to go digging, do you have a rapist's shitty MRA website bookmarked?
POST A LINK OR ADMIT YOU'RE MISINFORMED. You made a specific claim. You cannot back the claim. Now you're just flailing around in the wind. It's sad. Very, very sad.
edit - and, uh, trigger warning: here's RooshV's advice in his own words:
“No means no — until it means yes. The sex was painful for her. I was only the second guy she’d ever had sex with. I didn’t think she was lying, because pumping her was like jamming my cock through a medieval keyhole. She whimpered like a wounded puppy dog the entire time, but I really wanted to have an orgasm, so I was “almost there” for about ten minutes. ”Yeah, this is the guy you should trust for your news.
You seriously believe something he posted because you heard it once years ago. Repeated it here. And literally can't back a single goddamn thing, yet have some warped world view for it. Ever wonder what else you believe and are angry about that never happened because you're misled by people like RooshV?