JDreye - I did a google search before heading out.. clicked a link near the top of the search and saw some of the screenshots I've seen in the past, as well as photos of her in bed with one of the guys she cheated with. Google actually consulted feminists a few years back to improve the search algorithms so I'm actually surprised I got such a bad site, it was within the first 3 hits. I was looking for screenshots because unless we're claiming those are fabricated... I then skimmed the article as I was heading out the door. Obviously I pulled a site with a bad history.
Beamer - You know what I meant in my Trump analogy. It was an extreme example to prove a point that there's no way any of us could ever have 100% proof on anything we read online (which is what you use as your defense). OF COURSE I don't think he's a nice guy. OF COURSE he isn't. But have you met him? Have you hung out with him? Then you can only be 99.999999% sure. THAT's the point. You used that against me just to bolster your argument.
Look, your arguments amount to "What 100% evidence do you have that this is true?". Well if that's out there it's going to take more digging than I have time or care to do. I'm not testifying in front of a judge.
When half the internet has a beef with someone then there's probably something to it. When you can see evidence of them acting in the way they're being accused of there's probably something to it.
From what I've read / heard in passing she had a kickstarter for a new game. It made millions. Shortly after she posted a picture of her in a very nice Japanese hotel room wearing one of the hotel robes. Someone recognized (claiming to be female btw) the pattern of the robe, apparently each hotel's is unique, and was able to determine the hotel and how potentially extravagant the room was.
Just when anger started flaring up about no game being delivered and things like this photo started circulating she aired her issues with the mentally handicapped person who took his life over the post. I'm willing to believe her posts were honest, but I also heavily suspect the posting was strategic because of the timing.
I also saw tweets from someone who worked for her on how awful working for her was. Another female btw.
It's a constant flow of scandals for her. And everytime something questionable happens it diminishes the feminism cause for people who truly belong to it, and for the women who have their own real horrific past experiences. Just like everything else these days Feminism is being defined by these extreme groups who grab headlines and pervert the real cause.
It is my opinion that she, and others like Anita, weaponize social media, and exploit feminism to make money off it. It usually follows that if there's an easy way to make money -someone- will try to exploit it, right? If you don't agree, fine we can agree to disagree. But fuck off with your attacks at anyone who doesn't automatically subscribe to IF Female > Then Pure as Snow. Can't even have a discussion.
It's not a gender thing for me. There are people who do mostly good things. And there are people who do mostly bad things.