3.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Jul 10, 2019, 16:02
Cutter
 
3.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 10, 2019, 16:02
Jul 10, 2019, 16:02
 Cutter
 
Creston wrote on Jul 10, 2019, 14:16:
Drumpf only has himself to blame. If he'd use the POTUS twitter account, as he is supposed to, for his presidential bleetings, he could ban whoever he wants on his personal one. But since he insists on using his personal one for official business (lock him up?), he is not allowed to prevent people from viewing his inane ramblings.

But as for Ocasio-Cortez, I don't think AOC's speech is required by law to be viewable by all, like the President's is. IANAL.


Sure it is. The government can't shield itself from criticism. That's why the first amendment is the first because free speech related to criticism of government is an absolute necessity in order for a democracy to function as intended. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If The Donald can't silence his critics she can't silence hers. That chick gets way too much press.
"If you're going through Hell...keep going."
- Winston Churchill
Avatar 25394
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
2.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
 3.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
 Re: Morning Legal Briefs
5.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
4.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
6.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019
7.
Jul 10, 2019Jul 10 2019