Beamer wrote on Jun 6, 2019, 10:04:
Red886 wrote on Jun 6, 2019, 08:21:
Beamer wrote on Jun 6, 2019, 06:32:
ventry wrote on Jun 5, 2019, 23:25:
Beamer wrote on Jun 5, 2019, 21:45:
ventry wrote on Jun 5, 2019, 19:47:
Beamer wrote on Jun 5, 2019, 15:27:
jamiedj99 wrote on Jun 5, 2019, 15:07:
I guess all those LGBTQ+ people can just boycott youtube and we will all have to deal with a lot less hate on Freedom of speech
No one hates on freedom of speech, people hate on hate speech.
No one has the absolute right to say whatever they want, wherever they want, without consequence. Being kicked off of a privately owned platform is one of those consequences.
No no no.
You don't want to ban "Hate speech" because, it doesn't exist.
You want to ban free speech that you hate.
As everyone's interpretation of what constitutes "speech they hate" is different it becomes a tangled web no one is capable of defining to suit all.
Wait, hate speech doesn't exist?
You have to be trolling, no? Or, perhaps, you don't know what the KKK is.
the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.
I've never read any KKK tweets or posts.(have you?)
IF they (the KKK) say they a) "hate (insert group here)" that is still free speech.
However if they (the KKK) say b) "we want to kill (insert group here)" that is NOT free speech.
Just because you "hate" what they say in example 'a' (as do I) doesn't make it "hate speech".
The term "hate speech" is a term sequestered by the "loony left" in an attempt to silence opinions they hate. It is incorrect and false.
Crowder stayed well within the above.
However Mr Maza's call for supporters to "throw milkshakes" at people with opposing opinions is definitely outside the above. i.e assault.
He also calls for a harassment campaign.
That would also be "bullying".
Pot kettle, black.
This is great, your own definition of "free speech" proves there's no issue with free speech here. You're hysterical.
If Cutter tells me that I should kill myself, and Blue bans him for that, is that a violation of free speech?
if Blue likes you, then that is hate speech. If Blue hates you, then it is left as it is. If Blue really likes you, he will promote your comment.
Replace Blue with youtube/twitter, and you get the whole reason why it is a crapshow now since they hold monopoly
public forum protections etc = all bunkus.
You guys just don't understand algorithms, eh, and think everything is a conscious choice by a human being? Sure. Every single suggestion YouTube makes to you, and the billions of people like you, is hand-chosen.
We understand perfectly.
You, as usual, walk around with your eyes closed. Willfully ignorant.
Ask yourself why elections ALL OVER THE WORLD are trending away from the left?
Hint: The answer is NOT nazi's or bigots etc.
The answer is that the "average person" is sick to the back teeth of being lectured and hectored by the "Loony Left" on how they should live and how they should think.
Stick you "ideology" up your arse.
I'll examine the evidence and come to my own conclusions whether YOU like it or not.
The Lame Stream Media in the USA these days is nothing more than a Democrat Party protection racket.