Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act

Ars Technica has details on the Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act, a bill being put forth by U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) to regulate loot boxes, microtransactions, and other ways to monetize games targeted at children. They note that this still has a long way to go before being signed into law (here's a refresher on that aspect of this) and also have a reaction from the ESA, who unsurprisingly, are not enthusiastic. The Senator's office has distributed this one-pager to outline how this proposes to regulate games targeting minors or that knowingly allow minors to engage in microtransactions:
In such games, this bill would prohibit several forms of manipulative design:

Loot Boxes

  • Microtransactions offering randomized or partially randomized rewards to players

Pay-to-Win

  • Manipulation of a game’s progression system – typically by building artificial difficulty or other barriers into game progression – to induce players to spend money on microtransactions to advance through content supposedly available to them at no additional cost
  • Pay-to-win - Manipulation of the competitive balance between players of multiplayer games by allowing players who purchase microtransactions competitive advantages over other players

Enforcement

  • These rules would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which would treat the distribution of such games by publishers and online distributors as an unfair trade practice.
  • State attorneys general would also be empowered to file suit to defend the residents of their states.

View : : :
30 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 2.
Newer [  1  2  ] Older
10.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:29
10.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:29
May 8, 2019, 20:29
 
Angrius Maximis wrote on May 8, 2019, 20:03:
I would've thought all the liberals that post here would relish the govt. stepping in once more and telling them how to protect their kids and what to do in lieu of common sense. That is your thing right?

So what you're saying is cons never think of the children, much less care about them. Okay, got it. That's pretty much what everyone already knew anyway.
9.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:25
9.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:25
May 8, 2019, 20:25
 
LOL @ video. Laugh2
RIP RedEye9. We miss you.
Avatar 22024
8.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:23
8.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:23
May 8, 2019, 20:23
 
Introduced by a Republican? Wha...?

* Googles rep *

Ah, young naive guy still full of optimism and logic. His elders will soon disabuse him of these notions, and explain how such laws restrict corporate "freedom" and profits. This bill will soon be withdrawn.
RIP RedEye9. We miss you.
Avatar 22024
7.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:21
NKD
7.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:21
May 8, 2019, 20:21
NKD
 
In theory I support this kind of regulation. Consumers and parents are at a distinct disadvantage against corporations with unlimited funds doing what is essentially an exploit of a bug in human psychology. All to make a profit.

The "free market" isn't free when the power differential is so enormous, and corporations can simply buy astroturfing campaigns to ensure consumers are arguing with each other instead of rallying against them.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Avatar 43041
6.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:16
6.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:16
May 8, 2019, 20:16
 
panbient wrote on May 8, 2019, 19:06:
I'd like to see them try the same for sports cards.

It's essentially a physical loot box. You're not guaranteed a high value card in a pack even though they exist. You're not guaranteed your favourite player even though they have a card and might even be featured on the packaging.

How is it different?

You pay money. You have a random chance of getting what you actually want.

Ironic that politicians who are routinely measured by their ability to raise campaign donations as indication of their chance to win are decrying Pay to Win....
I agree sports card have a similar mechanic. Difference is that they aren't a $134B industry, so have flown under the radar.
RIP RedEye9. We miss you.
Avatar 22024
5.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 20:03
5.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 20:03
May 8, 2019, 20:03
 
I would've thought all the liberals that post here would relish the govt. stepping in once more and telling them how to protect their kids and what to do in lieu of common sense. That is your thing right?
4.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 19:54
4.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 19:54
May 8, 2019, 19:54
 
Even though I think loot boxes are a scam, I'm not sure it rises to the level of being in need of regulation. Although I guess an argument could be made that it is gambling and other gambling is regulated, so.. maybe. As far as pay-2-win, again yeah it is shitty -- but I'd hope our legislatures could find more important business to deal with... *sigh*
A day without video games is like... just kidding, I have no idea.
3.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 19:06
3.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 19:06
May 8, 2019, 19:06
 
I'd like to see them try the same for sports cards.

It's essentially a physical loot box. You're not guaranteed a high value card in a pack even though they exist. You're not guaranteed your favourite player even though they have a card and might even be featured on the packaging.

How is it different?

You pay money. You have a random chance of getting what you actually want.

Ironic that politicians who are routinely measured by their ability to raise campaign donations as indication of their chance to win are decrying Pay to Win....
2.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 19:05
2.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 19:05
May 8, 2019, 19:05
 
All very good and not too unexpected, but the first thing that went through my head as I read this was, "Oh god, Jim Sterling is going to be unbearably smug about this"

(and deservedly so, but still...)

Avatar 54666
1.
 
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act
May 8, 2019, 18:43
1.
Re: Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act May 8, 2019, 18:43
May 8, 2019, 18:43
 
It shouldn't be just for children but for everyone. It's a known fact, big publishers, like EA, employ psychologist known for manipulating behavior to maximize profits. It's base-level predatory nonsense.
The most exercise some people get is jumping to conclusions.
Avatar 18786
30 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 2.
Newer [  1  2  ] Older