Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - RSS Headlines   RSS Headlines   Twitter   Twitter

24. Re: etc., etc. May 27, 2018, 10:59 Numinar
Bludd wrote on May 27, 2018, 07:37:
thecakeisalie wrote on May 26, 2018, 19:40:
Bludd wrote on May 26, 2018, 17:28:
jdreyer wrote on May 26, 2018, 17:13:
Bludd wrote on May 26, 2018, 16:56:
thecakeisalie wrote on May 26, 2018, 16:22:
Hey if you people want to play female bionic commandos wearing Celtic woad warpaint in a game set in WW2, fill your boots. I'm not buying it and I said why. Instead of just letting my comment sit, you felt a need to ridicule me for it. Stay classy.
Hyperbole is a two-way street, dude.

@Bludd, good points, you should post more often.

@Cake, a shame you'll miss out. What will you play instead? Something like Rising Storm 2: Vietnam?
No, I told ya. He'll be playing Chess, probably game 6 of Bobby Fisher vs. Boris Spassky world championship match in 1972. I hope he'll play white because he'll lose otherwise.

@jdreyer, thank you for the compliment

Because personal attacks make you look smart, am I right? But you know, I don't need to stoop to your level mate and I won't because I'm a better person than that. I think instead of playing "chess" and spending money on EA's latest spew I'll play classics like Bad Company 2, one of the last good games EA made, or indie titles from studios that actually try to make a quality product.
We haven't attacked your person, we haven't called you names. We've pointed out that your mantra of historical accuracy is not sustainable and is not a legitimate reason for discounting BFV.

Btw, Bad Company 2 is not historically accurate either.

It's ridiculous that this is even an argument, I don't even understand it. Compared to being able to respawn and hunt down that sniper that just headshot you that you saw in the xray killcam, after spawning in the gunner seat of a biplane and then parachuting on top of them in order to knife them in the ass - having a pair of knockers on your character isn't even on the scale of what a fan concerned with 'realism' should have their knickers in a twist over.

And if it gets more girls to play than that is all the better. I wager it will draw more in than it will lose to any kind of anti SJW boycott, which in the unlikely event that it happens to an appreciable extent it would definitely make the server population far more tolerable given the other inane bullshit that seems to correlate with what is in the minds and comes out unbidden from such fanatic's keyboards.

And if anyone takes this as a slight on their character or beliefs than that is exactly as I intend to be understood.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. May 25, 18:36 Re: etc., etc. MoreLuckThanSkill
  9. May 26, 09:40  Re: etc., etc. Numinar
  2. May 25, 18:45 Re: etc., etc.  jdreyer 
  4. May 25, 22:43  Re: etc., etc. DangerDog
  3. May 25, 19:21 Re: Evening Legal Briefs JTW
  5. May 26, 01:31 Re: etc., etc. thecakeisalie
  6. May 26, 05:05  Re: etc., etc. MoreLuckThanSkill
  10. May 26, 12:00   Re: etc., etc. Dacron
  7. May 26, 05:52  Re: etc., etc. Bludd
  8. May 26, 08:41   Re: etc., etc. Rhett
  11. May 26, 13:12    Re: etc., etc. DangerDog
  12. May 26, 13:45     Re: etc., etc. Bludd
  19. May 26, 19:31      Re: etc., etc. DangerDog
  13. May 26, 14:58 Re: etc., etc. ZeroPike1
  14. May 26, 16:22 Re: etc., etc. thecakeisalie
  15. May 26, 16:56  Re: etc., etc. Bludd
  16. May 26, 17:13   Re: etc., etc.  jdreyer 
  17. May 26, 17:28    Re: etc., etc. Bludd
  20. May 26, 19:40     Re: etc., etc. thecakeisalie
  22. May 27, 07:37      Re: etc., etc. Bludd
>> 24. May 27, 10:59       Re: etc., etc. Numinar
  18. May 26, 18:18  Re: etc., etc. Beamer
  21. May 26, 20:00   Re: etc., etc. thecakeisalie
  25. May 27, 11:01    Re: etc., etc. Beamer
  23. May 27, 09:51 Re: etc., etc.  RedEye9 
  26. May 27, 13:30 Re: etc., etc. HorrorScope