ESA Rebukes President Trump [Jan 12, 2018, 10:54 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
The Entertainment Software Association has stepped into the fray with President
Trump after his
widely reported comments about immigration where the POTUS allegedly decried
those who emigrate from "shithole" countries.
Polygon has the following response from the ESA:
"America’s greatness is built on our diversity," reads the ESA’s statement. "The president’s repulsive comments undermine the fundamental values of who we are as a country. There is no place in our society for this type of backward thinking, and we condemn it in the strongest terms."
Jeraxle wrote on Jan 12, 2018, 19:25:eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 12, 2018, 19:19:Jeraxle wrote on Jan 12, 2018, 19:02:From 2011
Read my reply. On Politifact's own website and an Op Ed by the donor himself.
I looked at the site right now, and I see no left or right leaning anywhere, sounds like most of the reporting done on there is based on facts from other sources (A thing both wing supporters seem to be allergic to though)
And Trump isn't attacked on there, he is fact checked though, like everyone else. If that is a dem leaning website the democratic party in your mind must be a pretty weird nearly neutral hybrid
Yes, the original page was put up in 2011. However, if you read it, you'll note not far into it that the information is current as of October 31, 2017.
So rather than show fact and cite sources, you just proclaim that you see no bias? Well then, I guess that settles that. =P
Well as a German I have no bias to any of your political stuff
So yeah, in fact I can proclaim there is no bias, but I did not, I said I don't see any bias Though I will grant you that they have, like nearly all media, a hard-on for fact checking anything involving Trump and his various more or less mentally stable party dudes. Is that what you mean with bias? While it is certainly a political direction the site is leaning in, that itself is NOT bias. Assuming they fact check correctly. And what happens on v/b/logs is irrelevant. Only relevant parts are the actual editorialized content.Ps.: Bias is highly subjective. If you have proof they fact check wrongly or can explain to me why you see that then I will maybe see it differently.... just saying.. currently I don't see it. Clicked a few on their "fact checks" and it was mostly .. boring.. irrelevant US politics. What a surprise huh. ;p
Date
Subject
Author
100.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
103.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
104.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
106.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
110.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
123.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
125.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
153.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
159.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
161.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
169.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
170.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
172.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
173.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
175.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
179.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
181.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
177.
Jan 13, 2018Jan 13 2018
118.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
121.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
128.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
132.
Jan 12, 2018Jan 12 2018
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 20 May 2025, 06:52.