Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Out of the Blue

Happy New Year! We had a nice quiet time here, so nobody is suffering with any party regrets. Hopefully you're doing okay as well, or at least that your pet hangover cure does the trick. There were a lot of downs in the ups and downs of last year, so here's to a 2018 that has more ups than Michael Jordan!

New Year Links: Thanks Ant.
Play: Super Fighters.
Stories: New Year's Eve Hangover? Eat These Foods to Feel Better. With music to make hangovers worse.
Eight ways to avoid - or treat - a New Year's hangover.
"Last Jedi" At $1B Worldwide Box-Office.
Science: Why aliens are not contacting us if they know about humans? Explains astonishing 'Zoo Theory'.
FDA approves first shock wave device made to heal wounds. They already make the Lúcio joke.
Chocolate is on track to go extinct in 40 years.
Media: Not your grandparents' origami -- paper toys that DO.
Behold Chainsaw Proof Pants in Action.
Never kick the bull. What's that old saying about messing with the bull?
Follow-up: F-35 may see combat in 2018. TIE Fighter attack incoming?
New Year's Day Full Moon: Are 'Supermoons' Really That Super?
The Funnies: xkcd: Desert Golfing.

27. Re: Zoo Theory Jan 3, 2018, 05:44 eRe4s3r
jdreyer wrote on Jan 3, 2018, 01:42:
eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 2, 2018, 21:54:
jdreyer wrote on Jan 2, 2018, 13:57:

The problem with that theory is that it makes no sense. An alien society with technology above ours faces very real ethical questions to stop deaths sicknesses and wars, give us fusion power at least, stop us from killing the planet etc. Interference vs no interference isn't something you can decide on a whim. Imagine if we faced this proposition and you know what we would do, we would interfere. Star Trek prime directive is a big amount of useless text in the face of suffering and empathy.

It's misguided to assume an alien culture shares our values. Who knows what they are thinking. They could be completely agnostic, for example. Do you pay attention to the ants in your yard when you fix the fence?

It's not about sharing values though it'd be nice if they did, it's about the fact that no species behaves 100% monolithic so non-interference would never be the 100% agreed upon opinion. Unless they are an advanced AI or entirely digital, but then a zoo theory makes even less sense, they'd try to integrate us into a digital world. And ants are also very different among their species lines, but ants don't build space-ships Neither does any other living thing on this planet aside from us. Any advanced species would definitely regard space-ships as a sign of high intelligence.... if they got their own space-ships their society must contain scientists and curious individuals after all, and curiosity will never stop at a "you may not pass" sign.

Basically, you can't beat the Fermi Paradox, the most likely scenario (currently) is that we are indeed the only intelligent sentient life-form that is space-faring in our galaxy and any alien life we may ever come across is probably the kind we uplift from slightly lesser species or create ourselves through various factors.

Again, i'd advise you to read up on futurism and the fermi paradox. The read is heavily depressing if you believe in encountering aliens anytime in the next million years. Btw. Being the only one around that is sentient does not mean that we are unique as sentient beings, only that we have a unique time-slot all for us

Note: This does not mean there is no sentient life in this galaxy, just that it didn't get to the evolutionary level needed for advanced technologies either because of habitat (ocean dwellers are the losers in this, no advanced chemistry in water possible) etc.
Avatar 54727
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jan 1, 11:09 Re: Out of the Blue RedEye9
  2. Jan 1, 11:49  Re: Out of the Blue Bill Borre
  3. Jan 1, 12:26   Re: Out of the Blue RedEye9
  4. Jan 1, 12:52  Re: Out of the Blue Mr. Tact
  5. Jan 1, 12:59   Re: Out of the Blue RedEye9
  6. Jan 1, 14:19    Re: Out of the Blue afka Rossini
  15. Jan 1, 18:29  Re: Out of the Blue BobBob
  7. Jan 1, 14:20 Re: Out of the Blue afka Rossini
  8. Jan 1, 14:49  Re: Out of the Blue Mr. Tact
  11. Jan 1, 15:05   Re: Out of the Blue jdreyer
  12. Jan 1, 15:07    Re: Out of the Blue RedEye9
  9. Jan 1, 14:58 Re: Out of the Blue jdreyer
  10. Jan 1, 15:03 Re: Out of the Blue jdreyer
  19. Jan 2, 06:48  Re: Morning Mobilization Scottish Martial Arts
  32. Jan 5, 00:23   Re: Morning Mobilization jdreyer
  13. Jan 1, 15:31 Re: Out of the Blue Creston
  14. Jan 1, 15:52 Re: Out of the Blue Retired
  16. Jan 1, 18:32  Re: Out of the Blue Hoop
  20. Jan 2, 06:50   Re: Morning Mobilization Scottish Martial Arts
  17. Jan 1, 20:19 Zoo Theory eRe4s3r
  21. Jan 2, 13:57  Re: Zoo Theory jdreyer
  22. Jan 2, 16:53   Re: Zoo Theory RedEye9
  23. Jan 2, 21:54   Re: Zoo Theory eRe4s3r
  24. Jan 2, 22:16    Re: Zoo Theory Mr. Tact
  26. Jan 3, 01:45     Re: Zoo Theory eRe4s3r
  28. Jan 3, 07:54      Re: Zoo Theory Mr. Tact
  30. Jan 3, 10:28       Re: Zoo Theory eRe4s3r
  25. Jan 3, 01:42    Re: Zoo Theory jdreyer
>> 27. Jan 3, 05:44     Re: Zoo Theory eRe4s3r
  31. Jan 3, 14:52      Re: Zoo Theory jdreyer
  18. Jan 2, 01:10 Re: Out of the Blue Cutter
  29. Jan 3, 09:28 Re: Out of the Blue Mr. Tact


Blue's News logo