16 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
16.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 28, 2017, 12:51
16.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 28, 2017, 12:51
Sep 28, 2017, 12:51
 
Beamer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 14:44:
jdreyer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 13:24:
Beamer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 11:40:
Verno wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 10:11:
Let's find a way to tie this into politics!

Exactly what a liberal would say!

You misspelled "liebral" Beam. Nono

That's exactly what a cuckliebtardsative would say!

Laugh2
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
15.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 14:44
Beamer
 
15.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 14:44
Sep 27, 2017, 14:44
 Beamer
 
jdreyer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 13:24:
Beamer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 11:40:
Verno wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 10:11:
Let's find a way to tie this into politics!

Exactly what a liberal would say!

You misspelled "liebral" Beam. Nono

That's exactly what a cuckliebtardsative would say!
14.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 13:24
14.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 13:24
Sep 27, 2017, 13:24
 
Beamer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 11:40:
Verno wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 10:11:
Let's find a way to tie this into politics!

Exactly what a liberal would say!

You misspelled "liebral" Beam. Nono
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
13.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 11:40
Beamer
 
13.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 11:40
Sep 27, 2017, 11:40
 Beamer
 
Verno wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 10:11:
Let's find a way to tie this into politics!

Exactly what a liberal would say!
12.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 10:11
12.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 10:11
Sep 27, 2017, 10:11
 
Let's find a way to tie this into politics!
Avatar 51617
11.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 08:37
11.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 08:37
Sep 27, 2017, 08:37
 
jdreyer wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 04:43:
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 21:15:
whodathunkit.
I bet putting it on Netflix only for those outside the US had nothing to do w/it.
I blame the Ferengi who don't want to pay.

Well the other Ferengi didn't want anyone else to make any latinum off it. So instead of putting it behind a pay wall that already had a lot of customers and other content, they put it behind their own paywall that has relatively few customers and content.

"The best deal is the one that makes the most profit."
-2nd Rule of Acquisition
10.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 04:43
10.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 04:43
Sep 27, 2017, 04:43
 
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 21:15:
whodathunkit.
I bet putting it on Netflix only for those outside the US had nothing to do w/it.
I blame the Ferengi who don't want to pay.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
9.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 03:22
9.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 03:22
Sep 27, 2017, 03:22
 
NKD wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 03:18:
Simon Says wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 22:36:
Old trekkie here, watched the first 2 episodes on space channel ( canada )... And well, it breaks with canon too many times to count, frankly, it looks like its in the Kelvin timeline, not the Prime timeline. My guess is they worked on a lot of stuff assuming it would be Kelvin then they saw how much of a backlash from the base there would be and tried to jury-rig something quick and dirty and it left so many holes that swiss cheese would be proud.

It's set in the original timeline about 10 years before TOS. The tie-in novel has Pike captaining the Enterprise.

But frankly none of this bothers me because Star Trek canon is a tangled mess of contradictory bullshit anyway. Plus it was pretty clear that they aren't worshipping a deity or anything but just circlejerking about Kahless just like the TNG Klingons.

And to be more frank, most of the fans of older Trek are dead or aged out of the streaming service demographic, so I don't think we were a consideration to begin with.

Sheeit, I barely remember any of the canon as it is, it has been so long since I've seen TOS, TNG, or DS9.
If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. Slava Ukraini!
Avatar 22024
8.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 27, 2017, 03:18
NKD
8.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 27, 2017, 03:18
Sep 27, 2017, 03:18
NKD
 
Simon Says wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 22:36:
Old trekkie here, watched the first 2 episodes on space channel ( canada )... And well, it breaks with canon too many times to count, frankly, it looks like its in the Kelvin timeline, not the Prime timeline. My guess is they worked on a lot of stuff assuming it would be Kelvin then they saw how much of a backlash from the base there would be and tried to jury-rig something quick and dirty and it left so many holes that swiss cheese would be proud.

It's set in the original timeline about 10 years before TOS. The tie-in novel has Pike captaining the Enterprise.

But frankly none of this bothers me because Star Trek canon is a tangled mess of contradictory bullshit anyway. Plus it was pretty clear that they aren't worshipping a deity or anything but just circlejerking about Kahless just like the TNG Klingons.

And to be more frank, most of the fans of older Trek are dead or aged out of the streaming service demographic, so I don't think we were a consideration to begin with.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Avatar 43041
7.
 
Re: ...
Sep 27, 2017, 02:01
7.
Re: ... Sep 27, 2017, 02:01
Sep 27, 2017, 02:01
 
El Pit wrote on Sep 27, 2017, 01:36:
JeffD wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 21:54:
I have to rate the first 2 shows higher then the last star trek movie. It was pretty good IMO, can't wait to see more. I am a little disheartened after reading the wiki as it is apparently NOT intended to go on for more then a few seasons, after a couple of story arcs they will jump to a new ship and crew and time period (if the show is still going on of course).

Really? I think that the last Star Trek movie was more Trek than the first two reboot movies by far.

About Discovery: only the first two episodes of Star Trek: Voyager were weaker first episodes of a Trek series up to now. Discovery needs to improve quite a bit to stay for the usual seven seasons.

Technically what we saw was part 1 and part 2 of the pilot.. I hope this series isn't gonna FOCUS on the Klingon conflict....
Avatar 54727
6.
 
Re: ...
Sep 27, 2017, 01:36
El Pit
 
6.
Re: ... Sep 27, 2017, 01:36
Sep 27, 2017, 01:36
 El Pit
 
JeffD wrote on Sep 26, 2017, 21:54:
I have to rate the first 2 shows higher then the last star trek movie. It was pretty good IMO, can't wait to see more. I am a little disheartened after reading the wiki as it is apparently NOT intended to go on for more then a few seasons, after a couple of story arcs they will jump to a new ship and crew and time period (if the show is still going on of course).

Really? I think that the last Star Trek movie was more Trek than the first two reboot movies by far.

About Discovery: only the first two episodes of Star Trek: Voyager were weaker first episodes of a Trek series up to now. Discovery needs to improve quite a bit to stay for the usual seven seasons.
Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president.
-Theodore Roosevelt
5.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 26, 2017, 22:36
5.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 26, 2017, 22:36
Sep 26, 2017, 22:36
 
Edit: Got carried away here and after hearing other sides, well, much of what was said was irrelevant, so... ZIP!

Cheers folks

This comment was edited on Sep 27, 2017, 03:55.
4.
 
...
Sep 26, 2017, 21:54
4.
... Sep 26, 2017, 21:54
Sep 26, 2017, 21:54
 
I have to rate the first 2 shows higher then the last star trek movie. It was pretty good IMO, can't wait to see more. I am a little disheartened after reading the wiki as it is apparently NOT intended to go on for more then a few seasons, after a couple of story arcs they will jump to a new ship and crew and time period (if the show is still going on of course).
3.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 26, 2017, 21:30
3.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 26, 2017, 21:30
Sep 26, 2017, 21:30
 
don't worry, piracy will drop off because it's pure garbage and a waste of bandwidth - even for free.
Avatar 6174
2.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 26, 2017, 21:20
2.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 26, 2017, 21:20
Sep 26, 2017, 21:20
 
In other news, water is still wet.
1.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Sep 26, 2017, 21:15
1.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Sep 26, 2017, 21:15
Sep 26, 2017, 21:15
 
whodathunkit.
I bet putting it on Netflix only for those outside the US had nothing to do w/it.
Avatar 58135
16 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older