Hyped Links: | Thanks Ant and Acleacius. |
Play: | Fatal Stick Fight. |
Story: | Huff, puff, pass? AG's pot fury not echoed by task force. |
Science: |
With genetic morph, a weird type of anthrax has emerged—and it’s on
a rampage. This massive, spiky dinosaur might have used camouflage to fool predators. Jurassic World? |
Images: | Are these snakes or doughnuts? |
Media: |
IT Trailer 3
(Extended) 2017. Thanks RedEye9. Obi Wan VS Anakin- Fictional Fight Commentary. Norfolk Southern Train hits a limo in New Paris, Indiana. Thanks Boing Boing. |
Follow-up: | NASA job opening- 9-year-old 'Guardian of the Galaxy' applies. |
Fletch wrote on Aug 7, 2017, 02:13:eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 6, 2017, 11:15:They've got to find some way to justify buying all that Maxpedition gear and .22lr ammo. An entire industry was created off of their paranoia, which now feeds it to keep them buying shit. No... running their fat asses through the jungle on weekends and shooting cans just isn't gonna cut it. The unhinged, lunatic fringe want to shoot something besides empty PBRs. Unfortunately, I doubt their revolution will last much past the first drone strike, and a real opportunity to remove some Stoopid from the gene pool will be gone.
Good luck leading a revolution against a police state.... (Turkey comes to mind) you'd be a terrorist, and not a revolutionary.
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 6, 2017, 11:15:They've got to find some way to justify buying all that Maxpedition gear and .22lr ammo. An entire industry was created off of their paranoia, which now feeds it to keep them buying shit. No... running their fat asses through the jungle on weekends and shooting cans just isn't gonna cut it. The unhinged, lunatic fringe want to shoot something besides empty PBRs. Unfortunately, I doubt their revolution will last much past the first drone strike, and a real opportunity to remove some Stoopid from the gene pool will be gone.
Good luck leading a revolution against a police state.... (Turkey comes to mind) you'd be a terrorist, and not a revolutionary.
Retired wrote on Aug 6, 2017, 00:24:Then write the POTUS and tell him what you think, because he's the one who set that bar that low, as well as many of his millions of moron minions whose first language seems to be largely comprised of innuendo for violence.
The mere insinuation of killing anyone is disgusting. I am embarrassed for you.
SlimRam wrote on Aug 6, 2017, 00:17:
Venezuela 2017 = United States 2018
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
Edmund Burke
Or:
"It took a revolution to start this country, and it will take a revolution to save it."
My Grandfather
1badmf wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 18:17:jdreyer wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 18:00:
Just a few points about the second amendment.
1) There's no way a bunch of guys with rifles and pickup trucks can stand up to the might of the US military and win. Force multiplication via modern technology is orders of magnitude greater than when it was written. Just look at how that worked out for ISIS, for example.
2) The raison d'etre of the second amendment was to maintain militias in southern states for the purpose of quelling slave rebellions. It was not intended to provide spontaneous "Wolverine!" style partisans in the event of a federal government takeover.
i have good reason to doubt that most 2nd amendment nuts have even read it. a friend who was a trained lawyer from a prestigious law school was silenced (for a moment) when i paraphrased the text for him that the law was tied to the support and maintenance of a militia, not unrestricted gun ownership like most of them believe.
Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:33:RedEye9 wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:22:Listen, I am near the front of the line to complain about the GOP and I realize you are not serious -- however, even "joking" like this is not useful or productive. The best case scenario is you are ignored. The worst case is damn ugly.
We are one baseball practice and 4 memorials away from having a decent government.
jdreyer wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 18:00:
Just a few points about the second amendment.
1) There's no way a bunch of guys with rifles and pickup trucks can stand up to the might of the US military and win. Force multiplication via modern technology is orders of magnitude greater than when it was written. Just look at how that worked out for ISIS, for example.
2) The raison d'etre of the second amendment was to maintain militias in southern states for the purpose of quelling slave rebellions. It was not intended to provide spontaneous "Wolverine!" style partisans in the event of a federal government takeover.
Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 15:03:
Okay, first of all they are duly elected members of Congress, not some member of Royality who inherited the power to rule us. Meaning the problem isn't them, it is the people who elected them. Second, I don't want people being shot for their political beliefs because I don't want to be next on someone's list. Third, even if key GOP members (or any GOP members for that matter) were killed for political reasons, it would only increase their popularity with the populace. You think they have majorities now? Kill a few and they'll soon have veto override majorities in Congress and every statehouse in the nation...
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Cutter wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 13:09:Okay, first of all they are duly elected members of Congress, not some member of Royality who inherited the power to rule us. Meaning the problem isn't them, it is the people who elected them. Second, I don't want people being shot for their political beliefs because I don't want to be next on someone's list. Third, even if key GOP members (or any GOP members for that matter) were killed for political reasons, it would only increase their popularity with the populace. You think they have majorities now? Kill a few and they'll soon have veto override majorities in Congress and every statehouse in the nation...
Why? The GOP has declared war on everyone else and the planet. People have every right to defend themselves by any means necessary. Talking doesn't work with those people. They don't care. By your rationale there never would have been a War of Independence and no America to begin with. Like Thomas Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it's natural manure." Appeasement only makes the aggressor stronger. Ask Neville Chamberlain how that worked out for him with Hitler.
jdreyer wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 14:19:RedEye9 wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:06:crash between train and limousinethat will buff out
I hate to say it, but the way the limo was perfectly centered on the track almost makes it seem intentional. I mean, what are the odds? A foot in either direction and the limo gets shunted to one side or the other, not pushed a quarter mile down the track.
Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:29:
I'm a couple of hours away from a full eclipse location. Initially, despite my passing interest in cosmology, I wasn't planning to travel to the full eclipse location. But as it approaches I am feeling more and more like I should do so...
The initial placement of marijuana in Schedule I, the government’s most restrictive category of drugs, can easily be considered a mistake — though perhaps “mistake” is too meek of a term, particularly in the face of alcohol and tobacco being left off the schedules. In fact, marijuana’s strict scheduling emerges from the cultural and racial apathy felt by Richard Nixon, the activist president who signed the Controlled Substances Act into law. Nixon’s aides suggested the war on marijuana was racially motivated, and Oval Office tapes highlight his contempt for the counterculture movement as well as racial minorities.
The tapes also make it clear that Nixon wanted to link marijuana use and its negative effects to two groups who he held in contempt: African Americans and hippies.
RedEye9 wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:06:crash between train and limousinethat will buff out
Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:33:RedEye9 wrote on Aug 5, 2017, 11:22:Listen, I am near the front of the line to complain about the GOP and I realize you are not serious -- however, even "joking" like this is not useful or productive. The best case scenario is you are ignored. The worst case is damn ugly.
We are one baseball practice and 4 memorials away from having a decent government.