Op Ed

OnlySP - Lovecraftian Lies: Why Video Games Cannot be "Lovecraftian." Now you tell me. According to the archive, I've only used the term here 25 times.

View : : :
16.
 
Re: Op Ed
May 8, 2017, 15:14
16.
Re: Op Ed May 8, 2017, 15:14
May 8, 2017, 15:14
 
ItBurn wrote on May 8, 2017, 13:04:
VaranDragon wrote on May 8, 2017, 12:52:
I love how people are always complaining about how most articles are bullshit, clickbait, crapola. Then one comes along that is anything but clickbait, with well thought out arguments, and even some serious references and people just go:

"What a load of bollocks!" Without even reading the article, beacuse it doesn't conform to their view or opinion.

Wonderful stuff really.

Listen, the title is "Why Video Games Cannot be "Lovecraftian.". Now, regardless of the content of the article, the title is clear and I think I have the right to say that this is BS even if I didn't read the whole article. If the article ends up saying the opposite, that games can actually be lovecraftian, then it's not my fault, it's their fault for doing a clickbait title. So that's why I felt comfortable giving my opinion.

Yes, you do have a point that the title is kind of sensational, though it does argue the point a fair bit further on in the article. A better title would be:

"Why most Video Games cannot be Lovecraftian"
Avatar 58327
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
2.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
3.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
4.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
5.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
6.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
17.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
12.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
15.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
7.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
8.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
10.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
13.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
   Re: Op Ed
9.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
11.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
14.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
   Re: Op Ed
 16.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
    Re: Op Ed
18.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
   Re: Op Ed
19.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
    Re: Op Ed
20.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
     Re: Op Ed
21.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017
22.
May 8, 2017May 8 2017