Darks wrote on Feb 13, 2017, 21:02:
eRe4s3r wrote on Feb 13, 2017, 20:46:
Darks wrote on Feb 13, 2017, 10:36:
Angrius Maximis wrote on Feb 13, 2017, 10:32:
a $1000 dollar copy? Seriously who will back on that level
You would be surprised how many do that do. Must be nice to have money like that to just trow around.
Here's a lets play of the games action. looks pretty good so far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdVtEZAi3Wg
Good? that looks horrific.. reminded me of Restricted Area (2004) and that is not a compliment. And the let's play seems like super early stuff, no level up system, no loot system.. wtf?
Oh, you mean like how every other Top Down shooter looks and plays? Yea, OK!
Huh, seems the PR is calling it an ARPG, and if this wants to be an ARPG then it looks bad to me. If it wants to be a dumbed down shooter with 4 classes, 4 whopping skills per weapon and 2 whole weapons per class then it achieved that I guess, but it still looks like shit, enemies behave dumbly, there is no real power or fight management going, no scarce resources or tactical decision making. And while it looks graphically nice, it doesn't look like much more than a.. well, yeah, top down shooter.
Is this
supposed to be a top down shooter and nothing more than that?
You know,
ARPG -> Diablo, Path of Exile, Sacred, Hellgate London.. stuff like that? There is absolutely no RPG in this game (in the video you linked), and that is what confuses me greatly. It also cries to the heavens because it's another developer wasting the greatest sci-fi universe we have with mediocrity.
But hopefully this will still change... they say it is "very early" whatever that means. But if you sell it, it is imo valid to rate it "AS-IS" ^^