Darks wrote on Dec 19, 2016, 12:58:
So again, this is why Kick-starter fans are pissed off to no end.
I guess you don't get the McDonald analogy as much as I apparently don't get the KS controversy.
the kickstarter base was what 5-10% of the paying customer base? Probably much lower that that but I'll concede 5% on the side of gusstimation. So the other 90% of the people who gave more funds (alot more funds) than the original KS wanted or asked for should not receive the item(s) they paid for because the original 10% founder base didn't want/pay for it?
Your argument would be fine if they (CIG) did the kick starter, didn't do any stretch goals, didn't add any more funds or add-on to the project, and then came out and said oh by they way, you'll have to wait another year for what we had you pay for because we were too busy making something else you didn't pay for. But they did bring in more funds, they did do stretch goals, and people did pay for a FPS mode. Your argument is to say those people should wait longer for their game mode then I (you) because you came first in line at the funding slot.