Saturday Metaverse [Dec 10, 2016, 11:42 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
- The 10 highest-earning YouTube stars made $70.5 million in 2016.
- Live, for the moment. "The pressure is on for extreme athletes to be constantly producing content, and it's getting some of them killed. Thanks HARDOCP.
- Note to Breitbart: Earth Is Not Cooling, Climate Change Is Real and Please Stop Using Our Video to Mislead Americans - The Weather Channel.
And some of those motherfuckers have the gall to complain they're not making enough? Fuck off and die. Seriously.
Protip: If you're letting someone pressure you into doing something stupid enough to kill you, they aren't the problem.
Nice one WC, like it, like it!
Protip: If you're letting someone pressure you into doing something stupid enough to kill you, they aren't the problem.
Nice one WC, like it, like it!
"Hot air hangs like a dead man, from a white oak tree. People sitting on porches, thinking how things used to be. It's a dark night...dark night."
I would of thought popular music videos would of made the most money since they seem to be consistently high in view counts. Confused?
They do, the music industry made $1 Billion last year from youtube.
https://youtube.googleblog.com/2016/12/a-billion-reasons-to-celebrate-music-on.html
https://youtube.googleblog.com/2016/12/a-billion-reasons-to-celebrate-music-on.html
Live, for the moment.
I've enjoyed some of these videos. That being said, if they never existed, I'd be fine.
The only pressure these people are getting is that they put upon themselves: vanity, egotism, narcissism.
They are current and future Darwin award winners.
Also, kudos to the author for a clever title.
I've enjoyed some of these videos. That being said, if they never existed, I'd be fine.
The only pressure these people are getting is that they put upon themselves: vanity, egotism, narcissism.
They are current and future Darwin award winners.
Also, kudos to the author for a clever title.
To prevent CV-19, avoid the Serious Seven: weddings, funerals, faith-based activities, bars, gyms, house gatherings and other small events.
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." -- which that is, I'm not sure... 
“Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” -- Carl Sagan
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
It is well known universally that I do not make mistakes--so, if you should happen across an error in that which I have written, please be assured that *I* did not write it!...:)
jdreyer wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:25:
Live, for the moment.
I've enjoyed some of these videos. That being said, if they never existed, I'd be fine.
The only pressure these people are getting is that they put upon themselves: vanity, egotism, narcissism.
They are current and future Darwin award winners.
Also, kudos to the author for a clever title.
or future presidents of the USA.
WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:Something even you can wrap your brain around.
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
https://xkcd.com/1732
A mask is an IQ test
"All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." Blaise Pascal
"All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." Blaise Pascal
RedEye9 wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 14:52:WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:Something even you can wrap your brain around.
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
https://xkcd.com/1732
WaltC still can't wrap his head around segregation ending, and you expect him to comprehend climate change?
"Sometimes, there are two sides. But more often, one side says it is a car. And one side says it is an umbrella. And only one is right. And the other one doesn’t deserve our attention." -Shepard Smith
The pressure is on for extreme athletes to be constantly producing content, and it's getting some of them killed
And?
Creston wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 16:00:There is a Darwin awards joke in there somewhere.The pressure is on for extreme athletes to be constantly producing content, and it's getting some of them killed
And?
WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
The citations in that bullshit are ridiculous, did you actually read the sources? 2 conservative think tanks and a fucking wordpress blog. You can't afford to be this naive when people are trying to pull the wool over your eyes. Do some research man, for fucks sake.
Redmask wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 16:24:Garbage in, garbage out.WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
The citations in that bullshit are ridiculous, did you actually read the sources? 2 conservative think tanks and a fucking wordpress blog. You can't afford to be this naive when people are trying to pull the wool over your eyes. Do some research man, for fucks sake.
A mask is an IQ test
"All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." Blaise Pascal
"All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." Blaise Pascal
RedEye9 wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 17:17:Redmask wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 16:24:Garbage in, garbage out.WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
The citations in that bullshit are ridiculous, did you actually read the sources? 2 conservative think tanks and a fucking wordpress blog. You can't afford to be this naive when people are trying to pull the wool over your eyes. Do some research man, for fucks sake.
You don't disprove a conspiracy, you only prove that it's bigger and deeper than anyone thought.
Quboid wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 17:22:
You don't disprove a conspiracy, you only prove that it's bigger and deeper than anyone thought.
Thats the best part of conspiracy theories. Literally unassailable because any proof that contradicts them is ACTUALLY proof of the conspiracy.
"Sometimes, there are two sides. But more often, one side says it is a car. And one side says it is an umbrella. And only one is right. And the other one doesn’t deserve our attention." -Shepard Smith
WaltC wrote on Dec 10, 2016, 13:50:
Fake News From the Weather Channel, even! Funny, but not surprising
A fake news site (Breitbart) calling a legit news source "fake". That's rich. Call me when Breitbart has actual climate scientists working for them and can present some factual studies.
And just think, one of the main guys behind Breitbart is the right hand man of the President elect! Fun, fun! I'm sure that will turn out to be a fantastic deal for everyone!
“Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” -- Carl Sagan
Saboth wrote on Dec 11, 2016, 00:11:
A fake news site (Breitbart) calling a legit news source "fake". That's rich. Call me when Breitbart has actual climate scientists working for them and can present some factual studies.
Would that be just like ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR and so on and their fake news? I've still got the newspaper and reel-to-reel recordings of them pushing everything from "the ice age is coming" to "the world is going to starve to death by 1985" to "there will be no trees left by 2000" to "kids will only read about snow in history books by 2010." Or the more modern stuff like "hands up don't shoot" or the media's attempt to claim that the San Bernardino shooter was "linked to gamergate and wearing green and purple."
--
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken
Go ahead and post them then. By all means, lets get it done. Well? What the fuck are you waiting for? Post this shit.
Nothing. Ok.
Well until that happens, we're debunking Breitbart right here and right now so stop trying to shift the focus. That entire "article" was fucking dogshit and I want to see you read it and admit it. Go ahead, read that, read the sources and dare to tell me that place is a legitimate news organization.
Nothing. Ok.
Well until that happens, we're debunking Breitbart right here and right now so stop trying to shift the focus. That entire "article" was fucking dogshit and I want to see you read it and admit it. Go ahead, read that, read the sources and dare to tell me that place is a legitimate news organization.
Redmask wrote on Dec 11, 2016, 08:32:
Go ahead and post them then. By all means, lets get it done. Well? What the fuck are you waiting for? Post this shit.
Nothing. Ok.
Okay. No more snow in the UK for instance? The scrubbed article WAPO -- the incoming ice age Blahblahblah trees/food shortages/no more REM's/noble elements/etc
Same shit, going on nearly 40 years. Doom and gloom, and you wonder why people are saying it's bullshit? I personally like the "there will be no more natural gas by 1981." Just a FYI in the region between Grande Cache and Grande Prairie, Alberta there's enough NG to supply the US at current usage for 40-70 years.
--
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken
Copyright © 1996-2020 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2020 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 21 October 2020, 12:06.