Star Citizen Squadron 42 Delayed [Oct 10, 2016, 10:10 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
The Squadron 42 campaign for Star Citizen is delayed until 2017,
reports Kotaku UK, saying the news was revealed during a livestream from
CitizenCon. The first chapter of the single-player side of the space simulator
was most recently supposed to come to backers this year, but this news confirms
rumors of a delay that surfaced
last month. On the bright
side,
Eurogamer notes that Cloud Imperium Games released a new video showing off
how planets will be procedurally generated in the game, along with other
tidbits, including a sandworm, though they don't specify whether this is showing
us Beetleguise or Dune. Back to the delay, the Kotaku UK story offers two
slides with details on the state of the project, and here is what those say:
S42 Primary Tech Hurdles
Content
Most of our base technology is now complete
Still in Progress:
Subsumption
- Pathfinding Logic
- Full Animation Integration
- Improved Combat Logic
- Mission System Integration
- Enhanced Fight AI
Object Container Streaming
CPU and GPU Optimizations
S42 Status Update
Content
- All chapters and gameplay features at grey-box or better
- Taking one chapter to final ship quality - flushes out any technical, integration and polish issues.
- Building Technology & Systems for the long term and the whole SC universe - no short cuts!
NasWulf wrote on Oct 12, 2016, 20:25:Peeeling wrote on Oct 12, 2016, 20:12:
Don't forget Overwatch. I hear some of the character art was salvaged from Blizzard's failed MMO. I guess by your logic they didn't do anything wrong there either.
It's telling that your knee-jerk reaction to me saying they've done stuff wrong is to say "No they haven't" and back it up with a list of projects that went wrong. It's nonsense. Either your argument is that they haven't done anything wrong, or it's that it's possible to do things wrong and still turn it around and make a good game. Pick one.
hu? where did I say other projects went wrong? and when did I ever say that SC was perfect and nothing is wrong?
Sorry, wasn't talking to you with that bit. Should have attributed the two halves of my post better. My bad.
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2022 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2022 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 24 May 2022, 15:46.