Blizzard Dropping Battle.net Name

Blizzard announces they are embarking on an unbranding campaign for Battle.net. They launched the online service for their games in late 1996 around the launch of Diablo. The service is remaining in place, they are just dropping the Battle.net name after 20 years in favor of the catchier "Blizzard tech." Here's word:
We’re going to be transitioning away from using the Battle.net name for our gaming service and the functionality connected to it. Battle.net technology will continue to serve as the central nervous system for Blizzard games—nothing is changing in that regard. We’ll just be referring to it as Blizzard tech instead. You've already seen this recently with things like "Blizzard Streaming" and "Blizzard Voice," and more changes are on the way.

When we created Battle.net, the idea of including a tailored online-gaming service together with your game was more of a novel concept, so we put a lot of focus on explaining what the service was and how it worked, including giving it a distinct name. Over time, though, we’ve seen that there’s been occasional confusion and inefficiencies related to having two separate identities under which everything falls—Blizzard and Battle.net. Given that built-in multiplayer support is a well-understood concept and more of a normal expectation these days, there isn’t as much of a need to maintain a separate identity for what is essentially our networking technology.

We just wanted to make sure everyone was aware as we moved forward with this change over the next several months; we’ll provide any relevant updates as the transition progresses.
View : : :
25.
 
Re: Blizzard Dropping Battle.net Name
Sep 22, 2016, 08:06
25.
Re: Blizzard Dropping Battle.net Name Sep 22, 2016, 08:06
Sep 22, 2016, 08:06
 
Kxmode wrote on Sep 21, 2016, 22:56:
Perhaps Activision wants to license Battle.net as a Networking engine within their network of companies, or beyond (e.g. Frostbite). It would make sense to call it "Blizzard tech" as the name implies a platform built on Blizzard's reputation, whereas Battle.net sounds more like a service.

This makes a lot of sense and seems to be the most likely case.
Avatar 54413
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
3.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
4.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
7.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
8.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
23.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
5.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
6.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
9.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
10.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
12.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
13.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
14.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
15.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
16.
Sep 21, 2016Sep 21 2016
27.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
28.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
29.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
30.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
31.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
33.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
19.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
32.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
34.
Sep 23, 2016Sep 23 2016
    No subject
 25.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
 Re: Blizzard Dropping Battle.net Name
18.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
21.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
26.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016
22.
Sep 22, 2016Sep 22 2016